SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
The Bigot Thread
An SI Board Since April 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
740 22 0
Emcee:  Skywatcher Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
240Tell me why you disagree with it. Society uses language to categorize things. epicure-7/16/2004
239<i>Terming certain actions "theft", and making theft "crimiLPS5-7/16/2004
238Some people might believe that. Do I have to believe it too? No. But we'repicure-7/16/2004
237<i>If</i> [sic] <i>there an objectively correct answer? I thinLPS5-7/16/2004
236The issue about language is a non- issue, imo. All language is to manipulate otepicure-7/16/2004
235No More Phony Charges of 'Racism' by Gail Jarvis July 16, 2004 (excerLPS5-7/16/2004
234how can they let cyberken continue posting? it's beyond the realm Oh...itSkywatcher-7/11/2004
233yikes now that's a marvelous advertisement for retroactive abortion :-)epicure-7/11/2004
232Sometimes SI gives us a frightening look into the mind of a true psychotic: <Dale Baker-7/11/2004
231I've made a point to be welcoming to my Muslim friends at work. I think thecosmicforce-7/3/2004
230I thought about this for a while- and if you want to be proactive with people, repicure-7/3/2004
229I couldn't agree with you more. I think most people want to value people ofepicure-6/28/2004
228By the way, I'm pleasantly surprised at how well American Muslims and Arabs Thomas M.-6/28/2004
227<b>"Its best use is as a doorstop"</b> Brian Whitaker expThomas M.-6/28/2004
226Unfortunately bigotry on SI is all too easy to find as well.epicure-6/28/2004
225Ok, SI Dave was kind enough to provide me with the link I had posted. It was a Thomas M.-6/28/2004
224actually now I do remember...you're right....that website did have very quesSkywatcher-6/28/2004
223Interesting. thanks for letting me knowepicure-6/28/2004
222Well, SI Dave said it contained a link to a pornographic website. CC read the lThomas M.-6/28/2004
221Sadly, it happens all the time on SI.epicure-6/28/2004
220but this is a shotgun approach to many people....on a fair thread with little anSkywatcher-6/28/2004
219You may console yourself that it is not new at all. I have seen even worse. Whepicure-6/28/2004
218Message 20259802 crocodile or rattle-snake, jack-ass or whatever you like call Skywatcher-6/28/2004
217That's really odd. Did you ask SI Dave why he did it? Seems to me you'epicure-6/28/2004
216I didn't copy an SI post. I copied it from another website. I can't reThomas M.-6/28/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):