SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Just For Feet (FEET)
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
750 4 0 FEET
Emcee:  frank burch Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
250 Scott: Some of us were in and continued to buy more based on the company'sWalter High-7/2/1997
249 The restatement went back one year (I'm pretty sure). Anyone considering buScott Finchler-7/2/1997
248 It's the "material misleading info" I'm worried about. I donMark T. Heath-7/1/1997
247 Mark, According to Yahoo news, the suit alleges that the prospectus for the ofScott Finchler-7/1/1997
246 News is breaking that a lawsuit has been filed against the company. The storieMark T. Heath-7/1/1997
245 You might be right. Fortunately, the stock rebounded shortly before the close Mark T. Heath-6/24/1997
244 I haven't found any news either. I wonder if the stocks sold today were boGERI EASTER-6/24/1997
243 What's going on now? Down $1.25 with no news that I can find at the usual Mark T. Heath-6/24/1997
242 Three cheers for incorporating in Alabama! Hip Hip Hoorah! Now look for the coMark T. Heath-6/23/1997
241 Geri, I just saw that announcement. I haven't sold the Sept 20s like I plaScott Finchler-6/23/1997
240 PR Newswire, Monday, June 23, 1997 at 13:49 BIRMINGHAM, Ala., JunGERI EASTER-6/23/1997
239 That's not much for three months out. I'm really undecided on this oneMark T. Heath-6/23/1997
238 >> So what now? We do it again with the September 20s! They're sellScott Finchler-6/23/1997
237 Hey, I'm still here. I guess the 1/16 of a point wasn't enough to get Mark T. Heath-6/22/1997
236 No, not really. I think it was reported in Thursday's Investor's BusinMark T. Heath-6/14/1997
235 Mark: That was essentially my question yesterday. Sounds to me like FEET is aWalter High-6/13/1997
234 Yes, I realize that. My point is why does a company with $138 million in cash Mark T. Heath-6/12/1997
233 Mark: My guess would be that bonds are merely a convenient place to park a lotWalter High-6/12/1997
232 I just got my annual report. Could someone explain to me the logic behind thisMark T. Heath-6/12/1997
231 Walter, Could be for acquisitions. $100 million goes a long way. I still thinScott Finchler-6/12/1997
230 Just when I thought I was going to get called out of this stock at $17.50, manaMark T. Heath-6/11/1997
229 Scott: Didn't call IR. My experience is that they won't tell me anythWalter High-6/11/1997
228 Walter, According to the press release the money's for: >> general cScott Finchler-6/11/1997
227 Anybody have any idea why FEET needs another $100 million when they reported ovWalter High-6/11/1997
226 You have to be right. Net income was revised down. Generally, accountants tenMark T. Heath-6/3/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News