SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
IMP, Inc. (IMPX @ 7 1/8)A sympathy play with IOM??
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2560 2 0 IMPX
Emcee:  Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2535 I agree, Gary . . . if there is reason to buy more shares.lml-9/25/1997
2534 Agree, when year end tax selling comes, final capitulation may also come imo. Gary105-9/24/1997
2533 Xavier in view of the history of this stock maybe we all need to cut posters a rpsev-9/24/1997
2532 Hi Xavier: Now this stock is getting me depressed! Why did it break through 1-mike mccann-9/24/1997
2531 Xavier, the volume has increased, but nothing like a real turn around, this timZeev Hed-9/24/1997
2530 Bob: Sorry, somehow I missed the OAKT loss. It's possilbe that I am not loXavier-9/24/1997
2529 You failed to see OAKT's loss of some .44 /share the 4th qtr of 1996 OAKrpsev-9/24/1997
2528 You may have been BANG on target. The company announced two new products(checkSalim Imani-9/24/1997
2527 Xavier: A stock behaving like IMPX often will go through a final stage of cathaZeev Hed-9/23/1997
2526 lml: That is exactly what I was doing, speculating. When I express something Xavier-9/23/1997
2525 Xavier, your speculation that "the other possibility is that someone knowslml-9/23/1997
2524 AMERICAN CUSTOM COMP - Powerhouse Western Digital Joins Iomega In Giving Sole-semichael-9/23/1997
2523 No Zeev, I don't believe anyone is buying here. The volume has gone way upXavier-9/23/1997
2522 Xavier: If Law think that the stock is unjustifiably low (otherwise, he would nZeev Hed-9/23/1997
2521 Bob: I checked the OAKT chart and fail to see the comparison with IMPX. I didXavier-9/23/1997
2520 Xavier. Is IMPX in the manipulation business. Lose jobs - naaah could open urpsev-9/23/1997
2519 Xavier: Like I said in an earlier post w/o any analysis, but with an intuitivelml-9/22/1997
2518 Barton: Using the numbers from a comparable company (TLCM) with regard to salXavier-9/22/1997
2517 Barton: I am not very good at number-crunching so I will give you what I have.Xavier-9/22/1997
2516 Xavier: Sorry ... I'm also down money wise on this stock although not the rlev-9/18/1997
2515 RICH: You know the saying "Hindsight is 20/20." This stock has beenXavier-9/18/1997
2514 Xavier: I'd like to see this stock hit 1 so I can buy more ... why? becausrlev-9/18/1997
2513 Sheldon: You're right. Back at the end of 1990 and beginning of 1991 the Xavier-9/18/1997
2512 Xavier, For what its worth the stock has been lower than $1.50. It has gone tSheldon C.-9/17/1997
2511 Thanks Xavier. Can you project future value of this stock by using industry P/bottomfish-9/17/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):