SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ultratech Stepper
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3696 58 0 UTEK
Emcee:  Kirk © Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2646 AV, How about stepping up to the plate and telling what you thing the bad newsDemosthenes-8/15/1998
2645 Jeff, I can't get the Lehman link to work. Could you cut and paste it forDemosthenes-8/14/1998
2644 Lehman calls a bottom on semis: lehman.comJEFF CHAPMAN-8/14/1998
2643 Okay, AV, what bad news re Ultrabeam are you referring to? IR at UTEK has notDemosthenes-8/13/1998
2642 Andrew, what bad news do you see coming down the pike? Art said the disk driveDavid Aegis-8/13/1998
2641 What does "facilitized" mean? Thanks, I2 Investor2-8/12/1998
2640 That wouldn't really surprise me either. The rumor at Semicon was that AMATCarl Mays-8/12/1998
2639 Carl, I would be very surprised if AMAT doesn't make an attempt to entIan@SI-8/12/1998
2638 ISI had a negligible market share at .5% in the last Dataquest study. The fact Carl Mays-8/12/1998
2637 Re ISI acquisition: Art seemed to think that it gave him a full range of steppIan@SI-8/12/1998
2636 Andrew, I still do not understand the reasoning behind the ISI acquisition eitCarl Mays-8/12/1998
2635 The e-beam system at PLAB was facilitized according to my sources. they do haveAndrew Vance-8/12/1998
2634 RE: "According to some friends at UTEK, they are going to lay-off about 50Investor2-8/11/1998
2633 Great details Andrew, You really sound like you know what the hell is going onRaju K-8/11/1998
2632 Justa and all--OT: Not trying to open old discussions, but I thought some mightSam-8/5/1998
2631 All: Ultrabeam -- pubs.cmpnet.comJusta Werkenstiff-8/5/1998
2630 The last dielectric layer of the process where the metal pads are exposed for wAndrew Vance-8/1/1998
2629 Actually, the very top layers might be at 0.5u (or at least 0.35u, which is aboKatherine Derbyshire-7/31/1998
2628 <i> PS What layers is it that typically use the largest dimensions? I asKirk ©-7/31/1998
2627 Andrew - Thanks for the info. Guess I'm going to have to dig some more. AClarksterh-7/31/1998
2626 That is a difficult question to answer but I will try. As we shrink device techAndrew Vance-7/31/1998
2625 Andrew - Question: When companies, say Intel, talk of being at 0.25u productioClarksterh-7/31/1998
2624 I am not familiar with Harkness, but he also reduced estimate for VECO yesterdaappro-7/28/1998
2623 I'd say Adams Harkness just doesn't see where UTEK is headed. <eom&David Aegis-7/28/1998
2622 Justa Werkenstiff explains Brinker effect at exchange2000.com appro-7/28/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News