Advanced Micro Devices - Off Topic | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
Advanced Micro Devices - Off Topic

An SI Board Since June 2002

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
1141	14	0

Emcee: jjayxxxx	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
266	Doug, <i>The reason insults escalate is:</i> Actually, the reason	inex	-	12/4/2006
265	Rink, Re: I also propose that if a person is often suspended for indirect insult	TGPTNDR	-	12/3/2006
264	Oooh, very good post, especially on the moderation algorithm.	dougSF30	-	12/3/2006
263	Rink, Re: mas becoming unbalanced Yes, I got an account banned over at iHub for	dougSF30	-	12/3/2006
262	mas, has done much more than call me a hypocrite. He's unleashed a litany of	dougSF30	-	12/3/2006
261	>> I just answered nearly the same question for Doug Rink, Civility on	Sarmad Y. Hermiz	-	12/2/2006
260	I'm actually against 2-day suspensions. The idea of 3 strikes and you'r	jjayxxxx	-	12/2/2006
259	Sarmad, I just answered nearly the same question for Doug. Message 23064841 Reg	Rink	-	12/2/2006
258	Doug, re: <i>I thought there were to be no insults to other posters, perio	Rink	-	12/2/2006
257	Rink, this new rule of "insults are allowed if you give reasons" is ba	Sarmad Y. Hermiz	-	12/2/2006
256	I also propose that if a person is often suspended for indirect insults without	Rink	-	12/2/2006
255	TGP, I'm against linchings. I'm for the current voting process. As I sai	Rink	-	12/2/2006
254	thanks jjayxxxx well said. and keep up the good work Rink.	rsi_boy	-	12/2/2006
253	jjay <i>please give Rink a break!</i> I have to agree. Rink is not	Elmer Phud	-	12/2/2006
252	As a long time reader of the Mod. AMD thread and a contributor to the thread by	jjayxxxx	-	12/2/2006
251	Excuse me, Rink? The overflow on that board was 1-sided, as were all the insults	dougSF30	-	12/1/2006
250	mas, you just posted ANOTHER insult ("You have no credibility!") on th	dougSF30	-	12/1/2006
249	mas, your repeated insulting and OT posts are directly in violation of the rules	dougSF30	-	12/1/2006
248	mas, you continue to violate the OT rule on the main AMD board. I have asked Rin	dougSF30	-	12/1/2006
247	A cherry-picked segment does not "the record" make.	dougSF30	-	12/1/2006
246	Rink, I'm in favor of public linchings. Never liked the private response req	TGPTNDR	-	11/30/2006
245	Yes, that would be a good idea. A 48-hour auto-vacation sans vote for "clev	dougSF30	-	11/30/2006
244	You're an offender, Robert. Never any content. Just butt-slapping cheerleadi	dougSF30	-	11/30/2006
243	<i>Thread, a general remark considering that the amount of indirect insult	FJB	-	11/30/2006
242	Thread, a general remark considering that the amount of indirect insults seems t	Rink	-	11/30/2006

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):