SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Computer Associates
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5232 59 0 CA
Emcee:  Everard Taylor Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2682 << Here sre CA's histirical numbers and new earning estimate(after toWigglesworth-7/22/1998
2681 You will see more and more disappointments attributed to Y2K spending issues whArrow Hd.-7/22/1998
2680 CEO sold 2.286M shares since May 1, 1998 all in the mid-$50's range.Robert Scott-7/22/1998
2679 My experience has been that these stocks may pop the next day but they almost aRobert Scott-7/22/1998
2678 Here sre CA's histirical numbers and new earning estimate(after today'sXpiderman-7/22/1998
2677 Would you buy more down here CA took at hit? Tech sec. is getting scary.. it sinvestz-7/22/1998
2676 I also picked it up today. Judging from the nice rebound from the big drop lastPete-7/22/1998
2675 I picked up 300 of the 700 shares I dropped on 7/14. A bounce is not necessaryenginer-7/22/1998
2674 Dear Rancher, If you careful read through my post you will see my point. It hGall-7/22/1998
2673 Alex Brown maintains buy rating on CA! says the slow down that CA warned aboutbattle beast-7/22/1998
2672 Quickly cruising throught the previous posts, I assume we do not see a bounce hSteve Casey-7/22/1998
2671 my little bird listened to the call (i think), and it says that the impact as aThe Rancher-7/22/1998
2670 Hence the importance of building the service revenues....i.e. full service soluBox-By-The-Riviera™-7/22/1998
2669 dear trial member- 1) you did not warn people about a flawed business model, jThe Rancher-7/22/1998
2668 They should be handed their heads as far as I'm concerned. It wouldn;t surpDavid Lawrence-7/22/1998
2667 Rancher: Thanks for your explanation of the site license issue. It was mentirupert1-7/22/1998
2666 Anyone know if its true that Charles & Sanjay took care of themselves with GSXR-7/22/1998
2665 Good point Rancher.They have to show how can they change the entire business moGall-7/22/1998
2664 I feel like someone just shoved a freight train up my bum. Seriously, This is John Solder-7/22/1998
2663 << How about preceded by the usual profit taking? >> David, You arWigglesworth-7/22/1998
2662 this site license issue has been the risk on CA for a long time. it works when The Rancher-7/22/1998
2661 based on what you are saying here, the company is in trouble. where are you gereba kenith-7/22/1998
2660 business is flawed because of the mainframe site licensing model. typically, CThe Rancher-7/22/1998
2659 There should be an investigation on this company with those stock bonuses at thRichard Silvers-7/22/1998
2658 poor Rancher, why do you think their business is flawed? The company stated areba kenith-7/22/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News