SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Silicon Motion Inc. (SIMO)
An SI Board Since October 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2976 82 1 SIMO
Emcee:  Elroy Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2730<i>If anyone can explain how MXL's approach to this situation make senElroy19/21/2023
2729Entwistle & Cappucci LLP and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP File a SecElroy-9/1/2023
2728Does anyone have further legal knowledge on whether the acquisition price can beElroy-8/16/2023
2727Silicon Motion falls after terminating its sale to MaxLinear (update) Aug. 16, franklin1-8/16/2023
2726I wonder if this will play in any way? What is Section 238 of the Cayman companElroy-8/16/2023
2725Like I've said, the Singapore arbitration is not bound by New York precedentAnonymous895-8/16/2023
2724I'm sort of fascinated by this proceeding, and bummed about the confidentialElroy-8/16/2023
2723Well, I guess we'll find out in a few years... Due to the confidentiality oAnonymous895-8/16/2023
2722<i>Although shareholder losses cannot be included in the claim, but the meElroy-8/16/2023
2721Although shareholder losses cannot be included in the claim, but the merger agreyugolee1234-8/16/2023
2720Silicon Motion Terminates Merger Agreement with MaxLinear and Intends to Pursue Elroy-8/16/2023
2719Hmm, this is fairly persuasive. Shareholder damages are not damages to SIMO froElroy-8/16/2023
2718I saw that article. That article is saying, yes the courts (in Cineplex, in 2021Anonymous895-8/15/2023
2717Yes, as far as I understand that is what it means. There is no such precedent, aAnonymous895-8/15/2023
2716This is the article I referenced earlier about shareholder loss being the best mElroy-8/15/2023
2715Does this mean no target company has had it's acquisition wrongfully terminaElroy-8/15/2023
2714Yes, ConEd involved a material breach by the buyer. As for timeline, I don'Anonymous895-8/15/2023
2713Yes, I understand your position. I guess I'm just very surprised how littleElroy-8/15/2023
2712Your second citation actually agrees with the speaker that the ConEd case changeAnonymous895-8/15/2023
2711Here's an article saying the case he cited is not likely to be used going foElroy-8/15/2023
2710He doesn't have to be a lawyer to cite precedents (he starts out by saying tAnonymous895-8/15/2023
2709While he does cite precedents, he is not (I think??) a lawyer. So it's hardElroy-8/15/2023
2708Maybe hard to believe, but he cited two precedents that said exactly that (Con EAnonymous895-8/15/2023
2707I watched that video. The Speaker claims that the damages for willful breach ofElroy-8/15/2023
2706Focus Capital's Mordechai Yavneh returns to explain how $SIMO / $MXL deal feyugolee1234-8/15/2023
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News