SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. (XMSR)
An SI Board Since October 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3386 84 0 XMSR
Emcee:  HiSpeed Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3061>>> If it drops by 20% for Sirius they are in trouble. If history is ai-node-11/27/2006
3060If retail adds drop by 20% for both XM will be ok and should come in at 7.9 maybkovachs-11/27/2006
3059XM Satellite: BofA comments on near-term headwinds to XMSR and caution on SIRI (i-node-11/27/2006
3058Well, the reality is that SIRI and XM have traded places as far as volatility asi-node-11/27/2006
3057>It is easy to see why Sirius wants to merge with XM, but it is much more difHEXonX-11/27/2006
3056<I>09:14 EDT XMSR theflyonthewall.com: Satellite Radio: Probabilty of a SIi-node-11/27/2006
3055>> via the satellite standard guys.... Siriots, the whole lot of 'em.i-node-11/27/2006
3054via the satellite standard guys.... "Recording Capacity: The Stiletto is akovachs-11/26/2006
3053Talk about desperate! Not only is Sirius incurring SACs for what they are sellii-node-11/24/2006
3052 He didn't ask the question. I did.kovachs-11/24/2006
3051>The answer to the question is obvious. LOL. Okay, then why did you ask the HEXonX-11/24/2006
3050The answer to the question is obvious.i-node-11/22/2006
3049>>>The question should be why institutional ownership is 80% in XM and HEXonX-11/22/2006
3048 The question should be why institutional ownership is 80% in XM and 31% in Sirikovachs-11/22/2006
3047Interesting. Thanks for the link Rich. It looks like XM institutional selling coHEXonX-11/22/2006
3046>>>XM is >90% Inst. owned Do a little research sometime David. YouSirius_Rich-11/22/2006
3045Iwatch doesn't tell the story (in fact, I'm not sure it ever has). XM ii-node-11/22/2006
3044>>>>It is in the same category as Cramer pumping Sirius -- both totaHEXonX-11/22/2006
3043>> BTW, what is your take on Lebed pumping XM? It is in the same categoryi-node-11/22/2006
3042>>> Sirius must be getting pulled up again by XM. <>I would agreHEXonX-11/22/2006
3041>>> Sirius must be getting pulled up again by XM. I would agree with ti-node-11/22/2006
3040Frontmed- Sirius must be getting pulled up again by XM. :-)HEXonX-11/22/2006
3039<b>Sirius Giving it Away</b> Got to make that guidance, at any costi-node-11/21/2006
3038I wonder how ptel's short position is doing these days....kovachs-11/21/2006
3037S50 Fire Hazard? (Wonder if this has been fixed in the Stiletto????) You guys i-node-11/20/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):