SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
GALTECH SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS CORP. (GTSM)
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
394 4 0 GTSM
Emcee:  MARK F. POYANT Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
319You say "Gosh, you're smart!" but you may not understand that one gammaray-5/17/2002
318Dear Neil: "one bitter person" ? Getting personal, are we? It's Mahatmabenfoo-5/17/2002
317--- but you do not understand my answer Gosh, you're smart! Then maybe yoMahatmabenfoo-5/16/2002
316Because you do not understand the financial statements does not mean that I did gammaray-5/15/2002
315---Ok, at last you ask an honest question and I am most happy to answer it exceMahatmabenfoo-5/14/2002
314You posted the url and then the part of Norm's post that you wanted read. I gammaray-5/14/2002
313---- Worth Allred who you delite in discriminating against because of his age. Mahatmabenfoo-5/14/2002
312--I do not agree with Norm's tactics That's no reason to hide his ugliMahatmabenfoo-5/14/2002
311Ok, at last you ask an honest question and I am most happy to answer it. I will gammaray-5/14/2002
310I said the exact same thing yesterday so I did not give you anything new today. gammaray-5/14/2002
309As promised, the reason Pratt designed. Note that GTSM said it was going to repMahatmabenfoo-5/14/2002
308--- Pratt initially refused to resign. If true, there's no public informatiMahatmabenfoo-5/14/2002
307I will explain it again in simpler terms. Pratt initially refused to resign. Curgammaray-5/14/2002
306That is the most incomprehensible post I've seen in a long time. as to &quoMahatmabenfoo-5/14/2002
305I edited out offensive remarks from the rb post so as not to offend. I thought ygammaray-5/13/2002
304You're in fantasy land, Gamma. Saying that "Pratt squandered" anyMahatmabenfoo-5/13/2002
303The copied post from another board below provides good support that r and d was gammaray-5/13/2002
302Sure -- if you want to read the 10K with cadmium colored glasses it also says loMahatmabenfoo-5/12/2002
301“Finally, during the most recent calendar year ended December 31, 2001, we spentgammaray-5/12/2002
300GTSM is making no progress -- except to more recklessly invite an indictment. IMahatmabenfoo-5/11/2002
299"We are receiving bridge financing which permits us to pursue meaningful degammaray-5/11/2002
298true, I didn't point out when the E was dropped. Nor did I point out that tMahatmabenfoo-5/10/2002
297Thanks for your quick and very insightful notice about the "e". Howevegammaray-5/10/2002
296GTSM is now GTSME. The "E" indicates that GTSM is late in filing itsMahatmabenfoo-4/22/2002
295"Good point if you are saying that the landlord does not want them processiMahatmabenfoo-4/4/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):