SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
CYRIX / NSM
An SI Board Since December 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
33344 34 0 NSM
Emcee:  Badshah J.Wazir Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
31994 Pravin, Best idea that I have heard yet.. I almost wish it woudl happen, just Steve Porter-5/5/1999
31993 Steve: I guess anything is possible but it seems to me amd has way to much totejek-5/5/1999
31992 Steve - Re: " Did I say they HAD succeeded.. nope.. there you go putting wPaul Engel-5/5/1999
31991 Ok, IBM should just buy NSM and AMD, and then take on Intel. They could start mPravin Kamdar-5/5/1999
31990 Paul, Did I say they HAD succeeded.. nope.. there you go putting words in my mSteve Porter-5/5/1999
31989 Steve - Re: "Please point out to me where I reference ANY ONE of those chiPaul Engel-5/5/1999
31988 Paul, <i>Good to see you still think the MXi and HallaPeno and Cayenne aSteve Porter-5/5/1999
31987 Steve - Re: " Good to see you still refuse to believe that anyone other thPaul Engel-5/5/1999
31986 Paul, Good to see you still refuse to believe that anyone other than Intel canSteve Porter-5/5/1999
31985 Pravin, The other big problem with the merger would simply be one of EGOs.. ThSteve Porter-5/5/1999
31984 Ted, Don't count out Jerry Sanders.. here's a couple of good reasons wSteve Porter-5/5/1999
31983 Steve - Re: " What if AMD wants to build a MediaGX with a K6-III core, andPaul Engel-5/5/1999
31982 Steve, Better yet, what if AMD and NSM were to merge. They would not have to fPravin Kamdar-5/5/1999
31981 No one is really sure that they are selling cyrix (the media/znet can be wrongtejek-5/5/1999
31980 ALL: Here's a terifying thought.. what if the buyer is none other than gooSteve Porter-5/5/1999
31979 Mark - Re: " What would happen if National spun Cyrix off to the shareholdPaul Engel-5/5/1999
31978 I'm far from an expert, but I try and do my DD on technical analysis beforeStormweaver-5/5/1999
31977 James: OT Do you do a lot of TA when picking stocks? tedtejek-5/5/1999
31976 Could one of the buyers/partners be Rise technology ? Can't wait to see. Stormweaver-5/5/1999
31975zdnet.comgbh-5/4/1999
31974 Hope your right AB I think the big boys who were buying hard today know that gScott Carr-5/4/1999
31973 Anthony, That would be my wish list as well. But there seems to be way too muJoe NYC-5/4/1999
31972 <b>''We are calling it a Q4 financial update,'' said a sVICTORIA GATE, MD-5/4/1999
31971 I take it as a rumor, that is all. He could also say that he doesn't live wDaskin-5/4/1999
31970 To all Cyrix participants...Your help is needed. I live in Oklahoma and know adexx-5/4/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):