SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
MEMC INT'L. (WFR -NYSE) The Sleeping Giant?
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4697 59 0 WFR
Emcee:  ---------- Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3347 I think its the average volume for the trailing 30 days, but I'll double chAll Mtn Ski-5/21/1998
3346 The buzz on the street is that it will be at least 3 quarters before the chip sScotsman-5/21/1998
3345 955k shares short really isn't that high. I think the float is about 20M orCarl R.-5/20/1998
3344 **OT** Why aren't the quotes appearing at the bottom of the posts today? Proud_Infidel-5/20/1998
3343 I think that the volume spikes we saw about 3 months ago were company buybacks.Scotsman-5/20/1998
3342 Short Interest in the middle of April was 955,210, down from 1,034,546 in MarchAll Mtn Ski-5/20/1998
3341 There was a post about two months ago showing large short interest. This was diScotsman-5/20/1998
3340 Actually activity on the thread is heating up. Perhaps activity in the stock wCarl R.-5/20/1998
3339 Jonathan, I was the one that asked about the LEAPS. Thanks for the info sincDebt Free-5/20/1998
3338 Its not suprising. This stock has lost all traders, only people left are some sScotsman-5/19/1998
3337 I agree that we need some volume. The only volume today was early in the day wCarl R.-5/19/1998
3336 The volume lately has been pitiful. Even bad news would probably be beneficiBrian Fraser-5/19/1998
3335 No WFR 2001 LEAPs. Somebody asked about WFR 2001 LEAPs, which were due to begiJonathan Edwards-5/19/1998
3334 To date there are no sunstantiated reports of MEMC striking a deal with INTC. olduvai5-5/19/1998
3333 Well Zeev, looks like 14.5 was taken out easily. Your capitulation may be arouCarl R.-5/19/1998
3332 Scotsman, I think there was such a post, but it was speculative without third pZeev Hed-5/18/1998
3331 Wasn' there a post a while back stating that Intel was buying from MEMEC? IScotsman-5/18/1998
3330 Brian, at the last count, we at least were not sure if MEMC had qualified waferZeev Hed-5/18/1998
3329 Re:<i>one thing that works to MEMC's favor </i> Another is theProud_Infidel-5/18/1998
3328 Actually, MEMC is much less cyclical than the equipment makers (I take AMAT outZeev Hed-5/18/1998
3327 Yes, one thing that works to MEMC's favor is that in the long term the AsiaScotsman-5/17/1998
3326 Zeev, WFR will be the last in the food chain to move when the semi sector recovJudy-5/17/1998
3325 Carl, you know me, I like to wait until I either see the actual capitulation orZeev Hed-5/17/1998
3324 Current forecasts are for a loss of $.64 this quarter (better than last quarterCarl R.-5/17/1998
3323 I am one of those long term investors. I am not a good timer, most of my stock Scotsman-5/17/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):