SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Safeguard Scientifics SFE
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4467 83 0 SFE
Emcee:  Mark Sagarin Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3392 -OT- EBAY, $129 hit its projected high of $130 6 days ago [actual $129 3/8], anmichael r potter-8/25/1999
3391 Robert, well it sure doesn't hurt. ICGE is the big tail. Each point move michael r potter-8/25/1999
3390 Hey can we try to nail down this NAV thing? Sure is hard without John Arnopp hstill learning-8/25/1999
3389 Michael, Maybe this dog has two tails with the action in USIT today. bob robert miller-8/25/1999
3388 Robert, don't put CMGI up on too much of a pedestal. Remember, up until mastill learning-8/25/1999
3387 Don't forget USIT! How about that MSFT? Teflon Teflon-8/25/1999
3386 Michael, nice post explaining icge. If you really want to put icge in perspectillwk7051@aol.com-8/25/1999
3385 From yesterday, "SFE looks poised and coiled to go through resistance, posmichael r potter-8/25/1999
3384 Brian, yes, I do think ICGE is getting way ahead of itself on a fundamental basmichael r potter-8/25/1999
3383 Brian, I think you are being way to generous in your comments regarding ICGE. Cllwk7051@aol.com-8/25/1999
3382 Mike, According to my calculations as of 9:35 SFE's NAV is 52.45 making a 1LarryCPA-8/25/1999
3381 Mike: Don't you think that ICGE is getting way ahead of itself? Mkt cap aMicawber-8/25/1999
3380 With SFEs NAV likely in the low $50s at present, SFE is trading at just over 10michael r potter-8/24/1999
3379 Short term update. SFE $58 3/8. Acting well since the Aug. 13 th. buy signal.michael r potter-8/24/1999
3378 I agree with katherine, except that I think SFE should work more on its "estill learning-8/23/1999
3377 Since my earlier note, I've thought about the TLAB problem some more. I loKatherine Derbyshire-8/23/1999
3376 Re: holding or selling TLAB, I think the argument is really a debate about SFE&Katherine Derbyshire-8/23/1999
3375 Just a few minor comments. I agree that it is useful for SFE to be involved inmichael r potter-8/23/1999
3374 Katherine: Beautiful. Right on. Cheers. What else can I say? Absolutely, cogdichaz-8/21/1999
3373 >> Would hope that SFE management would give higher priority to stKatherine Derbyshire-8/21/1999
3372 Larry: Thanks. No way do I suggest writing SFE or its management off. I justgdichaz-8/21/1999
3371 Chaz, I see your point also. The problem is does SFE has enough brain power to LarryCPA-8/21/1999
3370 Larry: Very pleased to see your viewpoint. And you are of course correct thatgdichaz-8/21/1999
3369 Chaz, I have a slightly different view than you and Michael. I often find myselLarryCPA-8/21/1999
3368 Michael: Your point about SFE holding companies in trouble and selling winnersgdichaz-8/21/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):