SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Gorilla Game Investing in the eWorld
An SI Board Since September 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1817 78 0
Emcee:  Teflon Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
342 Teflon: The flip side of trying to break the Diamonds in the Rough into categogdichaz-9/16/1999
341 Teflon: Much as some of us might wish to concentrate exclusively on B2B e commgdichaz-9/16/1999
340 Mike: As an ole Fool, I of course agree with the value that Motley Fool repregdichaz-9/16/1999
339 Speaking of nurturers, did anyone see the nurturing bestowed upon the Motley FoMike Buckley-9/16/1999
338 Jill, <i>Because today's market depends so much on perception, I appMike Buckley-9/16/1999
337 Cha2, regarding your question about "nurturers" vs "incubators&qTeflon-9/15/1999
336 Cha2, I think we can come up with a name or term, but the tricky part will be tTeflon-9/15/1999
335 Teflon: As thread founder, could you let us know what seems to you to be the bgdichaz-9/15/1999
334 Bingo! That was extremely helpful, RTev. Thanx.Uncle Frank-9/15/1999
333 <i>Teflon, unfortunately, even the link you imbedded in your post leads mRTev-9/15/1999
332 Ratan. Chuckle. Yes......but. There are interwoven relationships in the nurgdichaz-9/15/1999
331 Doesnt this sound like a pyramid. With investments in inuts and one another, a ratan lal-9/15/1999
330 I thought this article might interest you: <i>INTERNET STOCK NEWS: Sept.Teflon-9/15/1999
329 *4anything.com Launches Affiliate Marketing Program, First for A Vertical PortaTeflon-9/15/1999
328 Mike, all your questions are well considered, but what I found most important aJill-9/15/1999
327 Uncle Frank, I have no problem accessing it. From the old SI, of course. BTW,Martin Atogho-9/15/1999
326 I had trouble getting DITR also. So, pursuant to Teflon's suggestion I wrotratan lal-9/15/1999
325 Teflon, unfortunately, even the link you imbedded in your post leads me to the Uncle Frank-9/15/1999
324 <i>Mike, I think your punch line is missing a word or two!!!</i> TMike Buckley-9/14/1999
323 Mike, I think your punch line is missing a word or two!!! Please advise... TeTeflon-9/14/1999
322 Frank, here's the link. I am surprised you cannot access it from the ThreadTeflon-9/14/1999
321 Now that the past 48 hours is, ummm, in the past, let's do a sort of post mMike Buckley-9/14/1999
320 >> I did show up yesterday on the G&K and posted my thoughts on the QUncle Frank-9/14/1999
319 Definitely. I'll put it in, Frank. <g> btw, I did show up yesterdayTeflon-9/14/1999
318 >> no one can focus on anything other than QCOM right now We're all Uncle Frank-9/14/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):