SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
GateField (GATE)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4005 15 0 GATE
Emcee:  Chi Jones Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3680 Doug,you may be correct as gate ,actel,idanta at a future date could sell out tjm-5/25/1999
3679 good find Tom,spoke with some people at gate today and was told morale is high,jm-5/25/1999
3678 tom thanks for getting the news out. Actel should have bought Gate last AugusDouglas Raushel-5/25/1999
3677 Grace I read the proxy statement as stating that both common shares AND prefereasytarget-5/25/1999
3676 Actel shows us the money!!!! "Actel Provides GateField With $8 Million inTom Shutters-5/25/1999
3675 In the proxy Gate has hinted that it is trying to interest institutional investMichael Greeley-5/25/1999
3674 jm, I agree with you. We all have to vote against proposal. I think that I bgrace-5/25/1999
3673 It would be simple for idanta to simply buy additional preferred shares or loanjm-5/24/1999
3672 No stockholder should vote for anything this rotten management has proposed,thejm-5/24/1999
3671 "GATEFIELD CORP files addtl proxy materials." newsalert.com GatefieTom Shutters-5/24/1999
3670 Would someone please spell out the advantages to Idanta of a 10 to 1 split whicMichael Greeley-5/21/1999
3669 Hopefully the proposals to reverse split and increase shares will fail as they jm-5/21/1999
3668 Looks like it'll be 2000 befor we get any measurable revenue for about 6-9 Ignatz-5/21/1999
3667 tom read the following post on the Actel thread "Yahoo" messages.Douglas Raushel-5/20/1999
3666 The Proxy I voted my proxy online yesterday and I encourage everyone who owns Tom Shutters-5/19/1999
3665 I would never authorize this management a reverse split or increased share authjm-5/18/1999
3664 Zeev et al: This wire holds promise. biz.yahoo.comlml-5/17/1999
3663 easytarget, reverse split may be desired to go back to the NAZ, you need tradiZeev Hed-5/15/1999
3662 Roadrunner........I agree with you 100 percent ToolManInc-5/13/1999
3661 Unless they are willing to share the details, I see no reason to give managemenroadrunner-5/13/1999
3660 It's tough to second-guess management in a situation like this. I think I hMichael Greeley-5/12/1999
3659 From MarketEdge, institutions hold 5.41% (down from 7%) and insiders hold 15% grace-5/12/1999
3658 If reverse splits are so bad for shareholders, why would shareholders (Idanta, easytarget-5/11/1999
3657 Agree Usually or should I say "all the time", when a stock does a reToolManInc-5/11/1999
3656 Show me one "successful" reverse split and I'll show you 100 thatLaszlo-5/11/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News