SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Interdigital Communication(IDCC)
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5195 110 0 IDCC
Emcee:  nicmar Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3970 <i>[four pioneering Schilling patents and one continuation of the pioneerBux-2/15/2000
3969 A license is not a sale. DUH! Given the amount of useless posts devoted to a Gus-2/15/2000
3968 We have a humorous situation on our hands. On one hand Gus has sworn off readinBux-2/15/2000
3967 At least, Bux has acknowledged that IDC's patents are pioneering. It certaGus-2/15/2000
3966 It's Molloy - which is Irish (the n*gg@rs of Europe - a classic line from Tw molloy-2/15/2000
3965 Darrel what is your point in this mailing Bux snippet in bold <i> now tw molloy-2/15/2000
3964 Molloy, it looks like you have had a positive effect on the quality of this thrBux-2/15/2000
3963 Useful reference materials: <b> The Federal Circuit Reinterprets the ChiuGus-2/15/2000
3962 molly. you may find it of interest that ERICY filed it's brief according tD.J.Smyth-2/15/2000
3961 I'm taking you up on your challenge, Darrell. Please show me a copy and pasBux-2/15/2000
3960 Molly, in reference to this statement in regard to the ERICY case posts that yoD.J.Smyth-2/15/2000
3959 Molly. Let me ask you a question first. Are you Swedish? I'm asking for cD.J.Smyth-2/15/2000
3958 <i>I am asking you again to prove your previous assertion that because yoBux-2/15/2000
3957 Molly; Infineon is obviously looking for a home for their own model. he'D.J.Smyth-2/15/2000
3956 again, read previous posts Bux. you can write. but you won't read what haD.J.Smyth-2/15/2000
3955 Why 3 G roll out will be slower than you think <i> 3G Cellular Handset Lw molloy-2/15/2000
3954 Darrell, I haven't stated that the '94 agreement is transferable to 3G Bux-2/15/2000
3953 Hi Darrel - Your focus in your argument with Bux has been 3G - the revenues fw molloy-2/15/2000
3952 "You are free to claim whatever you want and to refuse to support those clD.J.Smyth-2/15/2000
3951 "You still believe that an agreement can not apply to future technologies D.J.Smyth-2/15/2000
3950 Darrell, to repeat, I don't believe "IS95 and CDMA2000 are inclusive&qBux-2/15/2000
3949 <<Darrell, you are claiming some things here that are very material to IDD.J.Smyth-2/15/2000
3948 <i>tell you what Bux. you prove it is and i'll gladly give you informBux-2/15/2000
3947 What makes you think I am confusing the '94 Qualcomm/IDC agreement with (I Bux-2/15/2000
3946 tell you what Bux. you prove it is and i'll gladly give you information whD.J.Smyth-2/15/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):