SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
A US National Health Care System?
An SI Board Since January 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
42652 111 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
41502Pogeu, just curious if you read the whole article?gg cox-3/18/2017
41501Keep in mind premiums will soar for those 50-64 with low incomes, who look to meJohn Koligman-3/18/2017
41500I agree that the default is Obamacare, and I wish the Republicans could somehow Katelew-3/18/2017
41499>> Lumping voluntary and involuntary euthanasia together is either inapt i-node-3/18/2017
41498<i>The CBO position that cost-sharing would 'tend to be higher' oLane3-3/18/2017
41497but if “dignity derives from good health and ability”Dignity derives from personLane3-3/18/2017
41496<<As the CBO concluded, under the Republicans' system, “individuals’ cKatelew-3/18/2017
41495When Euthanasia Becomes Murder In the Netherlands an elderly woman suffering fri-node-3/18/2017
41494Re lowering premium prices: The Wrong Way to Lower Health-Insurance Premiums 1Lane3-3/18/2017
41493Reality! More morphine is very helpful! <b>"When it comes to savingPogeu Mahone-3/18/2017
41492Garrison Keillor: American health care is survival of the fittest [graphic] Pgg cox-3/18/2017
41491>> Ignoring assets is a conceptual flaw across the board. Yes, but statei-node-3/18/2017
41490>> There's no way to do a plan that meets Trump's promises, not wii-node-3/17/2017
41489Trio of GOP proposals would overhaul Medicaid dramatically, starting with job reLane3-3/17/2017
41488<i>Without a strong inducement for continuous coverage, then it becomes haLane3-3/17/2017
41487You make sense here. Oversight would likely be a waste of money.Katelew-3/17/2017
41486<< the penalty for lapsing coverage, although that would have needed to beKatelew-3/17/2017
41485<i>In fact, one of the things I disagreed with in Obamacare is that it didLane3-3/17/2017
41484<i> I was left thinking that there are some good ideas in it and that ultiLane3-3/17/2017
41483I don't have a quarrel with that requirement, but I'm thinking that in rKatelew-3/17/2017
41482<< don't support giving away health coverage unless someone is unable Katelew-3/17/2017
41481I used participate on this ultra liberal message board type forum, and there weri-node-3/17/2017
41480I actually read all but the last few pages of the CBO report albeit rather quickKatelew-3/17/2017
41479>> One would let states impose a work requirement on Medicaid recipients. i-node-3/17/2017
41478Somewhere in my travels today I ran across a piece suggesting possible program mLane3-3/17/2017
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News