SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Terms of Use: Are They Still Enforced?
An SI Board Since April 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
92 6 0
Emcee:  Poet Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
42Our memories of privately-expressed disagreements differ, as do our definitions Poet-5/2/2002
41You made a mistake not mentioning what you disagreed with. You did me no favorsepicure-5/2/2002
40<i>It is clear to me that you are all enjoying yourselves immensely in thijlallen-5/2/2002
39X, there have been a number of occasions in which i disagreed with both your idePoet-5/2/2002
38It is probably a question of "if the shoe fits..." I didn't have yepicure-5/2/2002
37<i>although stirring up a gang of people comes close</i> Who stirrejlallen-5/2/2002
36The only turning I did was to disagree with your notion of harassment. Rambi canepicure-5/2/2002
35I asked her not to do to you what she's done to me and so many other friendPoet-5/2/2002
34"""BTW- there is no nasty and nice X- there is only one complicatShoot1st-5/1/2002
33No. I think you take a warning as a warning, not an execution, and continue on Lazarus_Long-5/1/2002
32Whoa, Po! <i>Please don't do this to Penni</i> X hasn't doRambi-5/1/2002
31You may think I can read your mind but I really can't I disagree with you anepicure-5/1/2002
30<i>However, certain objectionable behaviors will result in banning if theLazarus_Long-5/1/2002
29It may appear to you any way you like. And if you notice I haven't been backepicure-5/1/2002
28Remember that thread rule I cited? It appeared to me that you absolutely were iLazarus_Long-5/1/2002
27X, I am so sorry that you feel the need to trash me publicly like this. You toPoet-5/1/2002
26OK. But if that isn't harassment, just what is? I know YYB was not amused Lazarus_Long-5/1/2002
25I beg your pardon?Poet-5/1/2002
24Merci but I probably would never post them because I think that is sort of low aepicure-5/1/2002
23No I don't think it is harassment and no, it wasn't intentional (my not epicure-5/1/2002
22<i>What were you doing talking about me on a moderated thread?</i> YLazarus_Long-5/1/2002
21<i>I've got a few PM's of my own- some that weren't even intenE-5/1/2002
20What were you doing talking about me on a moderated thread? Nevermind. I know. epicure-5/1/2002
19If this was the case, XXX and those like XXX would be making the rules..... JLAjlallen-5/1/2002
18Gee. That sounded like a personal attack.jlallen-5/1/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):