SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INPR - Inprise to Borland (BORL)
An SI Board Since April 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5102 19 0 INPR
Emcee:  Kashish King Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4352 John, Someone mentioned that the CEO of CORL is in the middle of an insider seTom C-2/7/2000
4351 I thought "sell" really meant "buy", news is coming. Time wCarolyn-2/7/2000
4350 Darrell, <i>It sure would be helpful if Corel has an established cadre oTom C-2/7/2000
4349 LPG: I really haven't had time to conduct my personal due diligence on thisBig Dog-2/7/2000
4348 John, <i>With the NAS up 77 today, the fact that INPR could only manage Tom C-2/7/2000
4347 75% of Corel is that the best we could do? I really thought that INPR had much LPG-2/7/2000
4346 Yes, Inprise sold out to a company that took two Borland products and flushed tAnnette-2/7/2000
4345 CNBC-POWER LUNCH COREL (CORL) CEO MICHAEL COWPLAND AND INPRISE (INPR) CEO DALEBig Dog-2/7/2000
4344 There has to be more to this thing than we see here. Only makes sense that thermax-2/7/2000
4343 John, with all this merger valuation silliness, why not have RHAT buy Corel/INPDennis Nicks-2/7/2000
4342 Thanks, With the NAS up 77 today, the fact that INPR could only manage $0.25 aJohn Solder-2/7/2000
4341 If the new company (Corl + Borland) was an IPO today, how much do you think WS Maher Sid-Ahmed-2/7/2000
4340 John, Here is an example of the type of articles I find that give me the same Tom C-2/7/2000
4339 My initial impression is based on investor perceptions. From the first announceJohn Solder-2/7/2000
4338 Mohammed... Yes It is the 'x' date that is all important now.. If we arPeter H. Mack-2/7/2000
4337 Exactly...same situation as AOL/TWX Young kid hauling Gramp's butt around. Annette-2/7/2000
4336 Re: <i>"Hopefully, SUNW and/or RHAT will place higher bid now that tTTOSBT-2/7/2000
4335 Re: <i>"That's exactly why INPR shareholders don't know whatTTOSBT-2/7/2000
4334 Correction: at $7.50 a share INPR would have a Market cap of less than $500,000Web2-2/7/2000
4333 I think it is too early to come too a conclusion on this deal. For now it seemWeb2-2/7/2000
4332 This sounds like what happened with the company that I work for. Didn't maMohammed Bhimji-2/7/2000
4331 Hopefully, SUNW and/or RHAT will place higher bid now that they know INPR is foBaram-2/7/2000
4330 Yea, just when I thought we were on the verge of something that could bring reamax-2/7/2000
4329 Sorry LPG: I just turned on the computer. Thanks for the heads-up. I've gotBig Dog-2/7/2000
4328 That's exactly why INPR shareholders don't know what they are buying inJohn Solder-2/7/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News