SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T)
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4504 44 0 MAN
Emcee:  Mark Bartlett Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4354In the end development always wins. when there is that much money to be made, Little Joe-5/11/2002
4353"It will be mined. What no one knows is where it will start or when"charred-5/11/2002
4352"They will never mine Tambo Grande " There is more than one target atralfph-5/10/2002
4351One thing for sure it will not be the govt counting them. I beleive the idea wasKrikor-5/10/2002
4350If there is a big vote against it perhaps so. Wonder who counts the votes now darusswinter-5/10/2002
4349It was actually the peruvian minister of mine who said that a referendum is uncoKrikor-5/10/2002
4348<moment of truth> Even if this gets a majority, the Peruvian government russwinter-5/10/2002
4347The moment of truth for MAN will come on June 2, when there will be a referendumKrikor-5/10/2002
4346Thanks Russ, Little Joe and Claude for the comments! JonJon Matz-5/8/2002
4345Jon, MAN has several properties in Tambo Grande. TG1 is onwed 100% if I remembeClaude Cormier-5/8/2002
4344<MAN.T doesn't have the right to operate this thing? > A non event, IClaude Cormier-5/8/2002
4343<Where's the evidence supporting the onside claim is really the question&Claude Cormier-5/8/2002
4342It is not a simple matter. It is very political. Sort of like zoning issues wheLittle Joe-5/8/2002
4341This district could be a huge enterprise in time, and Peru as an owner has a bigrusswinter-5/8/2002
4340Well perhaps the story needs to be retold. After all they appear to be within a Jon Matz-5/8/2002
4339I think they still have 50% but it has been a while since I looked at that issueLittle Joe-5/8/2002
4338Thank you Little Joe, I've not been too close to the story yet. Though it woJon Matz-5/8/2002
4337It has long been known that a condition of the granting of the option was that aLittle Joe-5/7/2002
4336What? "2. He is negotiating to remove the conditions that requires the minJon Matz-5/7/2002
4335After I received the message contained in the foregoing post. I called ManhattanLittle Joe-5/7/2002
4334Today I received and email from the company which read as follows: Manhattan MiLittle Joe-5/7/2002
4333"A lie is a lie, was it? If it was I ain't buying this stock", Letcharred-5/4/2002
4332I still hold 300 shares from the old days @ $3.45. Made really good money on theTheBusDriver-4/30/2002
4331I sold my MAN a few weeks ago. Too many unresolved issues for me and better stufElizabeth Andrews-4/30/2002
4330Agree 100% Liz. I would like to see it as well. Without it my money goes elsewheTheBusDriver-4/30/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News