SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Loehmanns (LOEH)
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
69 1 0 LOEH
Emcee:  Nutty Buddy Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
44 IMHO you can't go wrong with buying LOEH at $ 1+ , if it moves up from therRam Seetharaman-3/8/1999
43 Most of the shares (at Goldman) are owned by the Goldman Small Cap Value Fund, Steve Hudson-3/8/1999
42 2-12-99 SEC filing shows Goldman Sachs owning 591900 shares of LOEH. and AssurRam Seetharaman-3/7/1999
41 This dog LOEH reports earnings on 3-11-99! How low can it go?Ram Seetharaman-3/4/1999
40 A good post from Yahoo: Let me tell you, it was quite an ordeal trying to get Jasman-2/13/1999
39 I wish you (and me luck). LOEH (the stores)have a very good reputation on the Steve Hudson-2/5/1999
38 I like LOEH. My family shops their all the time and today, I'm in big. 7000Jasman-2/5/1999
37 I forgot to add the obvious: namely, that LOEH insiders now know how sales wentSteve Hudson-2/4/1999
36 Yes, normally, price action like today means some news has leaked. But there Steve Hudson-2/3/1999
35 This dog LOEH was as low as $ 1+. I bought a few shares in the past couple of dRam Seetharaman-2/3/1999
34 It will be interesting to watch now. The motivated (tax) sellers are gone tomoSteve Hudson-1/3/1999
33 LOEH is a bargain at less than two bucks, if it can show some results in 1999. Ram Seetharaman-1/3/1999
32 $6.00 is doable. Even $10.00 or $12 is doable. This is a very volatile stock Steve Hudson-12/21/1998
31 I hope I see at least $ 6 by next year end. I would be really pissed otherwise.Ram Seetharaman-12/21/1998
30 I agree. It has been under tremendous tax loss selling pressure the last threSteve Hudson-12/21/1998
29 LOEH has been a dog for all 1998! Christmas season is almost over! At $ 2 a shaRam Seetharaman-12/21/1998
28 Jim, Well I will be delighted if you're right. With those sorts of sales fSteve Hudson-11/18/1998
27 Hey Steve, My estimate is based on a very crude method. Won't be surpriseJim Mac-11/18/1998
26 Jim, I think 7% is high for same store sales. TJX and Marshalls recently repoSteve Hudson-11/18/1998
25 Where did everyone go? Yahoo!? Any wagers on same store sales growth for OcJim Mac-11/17/1998
24 The Yahoo! Board on LOEH is a bit more lively. You might want to check it out.Steve Hudson-10/31/1998
23 Same store sales growth and earnings growth, that's what. Same store salesJim Mac-10/30/1998
22 What will breath some life into this dog of a stock LOEH which seems to be goinRam Seetharaman-10/30/1998
21 I got sloppy on last post. Year-ago Q sales were around $112M. But theoreticaJim Mac-6/26/1998
20 Same store sales for most recent Q seem to be up 6% to 17% from last year. We&Jim Mac-6/9/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News