Interdigital Communication(IDCC) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Interdigital Communication(IDCC)

An SI Board Since March 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
5195	110	0	IDCC

Emcee: nicmar	Type: Moderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
4595	<i>of course there's need for base stations to carry multiple processi	mightylakers	-	11/9/2000
4594	Bux "There is no need for dual-mode GSM/WCDMA chipsets in the base stations	D.J.Smyth	-	11/9/2000
4593	You must have missed my point. $29 million or $30 million, it just doesn't m	Bux	-	11/9/2000
4592	Bux-Once-Robert ? Read my lips . Over 29 million.	Jim Lurgio	-	11/9/2000
4591	You believe recurring royalties will go over 29 million for FY2000? I doubt it b	Bux	-	11/9/2000
4590	Mr. Smyth, you speak as if Qualcomm will only release one WCDMA product. The WCD	Bux	-	11/9/2000
4589	Bux, Yes I see recurring revenues going over 29 million.	Jim Lurgio	-	11/9/2000
4588	Marvin, there is a very limited market for WCDMA only chipsets. IDCC's &quo	D.J.Smyth	-	11/9/2000
4587	Using guidance from management I estimated recurring royalties for FY2000 to be	Bux	-	11/9/2000
4586	Bux, I got this e-mail regarding the name Robert Sheldon. Jim, I read the rece	Jim Lurgio	-	11/9/2000
4585	Bux, Show me were management stated recurring revenues will be flat in the 4th q	Jim Lurgio	-	11/9/2000
4584	If one looks just at recurring royalty income and omits licensing and other reve	Bux	-	11/8/2000
4583	Jim, don't tell me you are not familiar with "emoticons"? You know	Bux	-	11/8/2000
4582	Bux You had the opportunity to explain several times who you really were but y	Jim Lurgio	-	11/8/2000
4581	Jim, time to stop distorting IDC's financials. It doesn't take a financi	Bux	-	11/8/2000
4580	For Bill Daglish and other IDCC diehards biz.yahoo.com Qualcomm announces avai	biostruggle	-	11/8/2000
4579	Bux, The substance is you’re a phony. You didn’t even have the guts to admit th	Jim Lurgio	-	11/7/2000
4578	Stand back and take a look at the bullish argument you make for IDC. It is full	Bux	-	11/7/2000
4577	we've been around since 3 1/2, 4, 4 1/2. where were you? you don't kno	D.J.Smyth	-	11/7/2000
4576	Something IS fishy here, but shouldn't we be focusing on IDC's strategy	Bux	-	11/7/2000
4575	OT: Hey Once how's the Tuna runnin up there?	doug ray	-	11/7/2000
4574	Where's the substance? Are you more concerned with whatever alias I use than	Bux	-	11/6/2000
4573	Molloy, Bux has a hard time getting his name right. He doesn't know if he	Jim Lurgio	-	11/6/2000
4572	w molloy, <i>And, by and large - who has been right?</i> Obviously	postyle	-	11/6/2000
4571	>> <i>The only people on this thread trying to scare people off are	w molloy	-	11/6/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):