SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Imperial Sugar (IPSU)
An SI Board Since January 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
121 4 0 IPSU
Emcee:  Paul Lee Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
46Cudawuda, $5 is easy to pass thru. Resistance more solid near $6 from the chart.Crossy-12/13/2002
45Wow, IPSU continuing to rocket north, smashed through the 3.50 resistance like kPatentlawmeister-12/13/2002
44Art, I cannot answer this question for you <g> but I think that IPSU is woCrossy-12/12/2002
43Holy shit, IPSU trading at 3.80, guess I underallocated on this one.Art M-12/12/2002
42Cudawuda, your thoughts are exactly on target I think. Someone is quietly skimmiCrossy-12/12/2002
41Hopefully the recent accumulation indicates that some relatively large entity haPatentlawmeister-12/12/2002
40Cudawuda, think you are right. Historic volume at $3.50 was almost nonexistant. Crossy-12/12/2002
39By the way, i wouldn't place too much significance on the 3.50 resistance lePatentlawmeister-12/11/2002
38IPSU near $3.50 Some Chicken Littles are still selling, obviously unaware aboutCrossy-12/11/2002
37Cudawuda, unlike you I tend to look for bargains in the post Chapter 11 field. WCrossy-12/11/2002
36Cudawuda your notion is generally right but bear in mind that the condition for Crossy-12/11/2002
35On item #2, perhaps they will succeed due to their recent asset sales. i'd Patentlawmeister-12/10/2002
34Paul, many thx for accomplishing title and header change.. rgrds CROSSYCrossy-12/10/2002
33Finally got the title changed, sorry for the delay but the SI people are not thePaul Lee-12/10/2002
32IPSU climbing further .. $3.25 and no one wants to sell for 3.25 - too bad ? IsCrossy-12/10/2002
31Imperial Sugar (IPSU.OB) filed yet another Form-4 (Insider Transaction) filed wiCrossy-12/10/2002
30That's why i was talking more about 20.00 rather than 6.00 i see your otherPatentlawmeister-12/7/2002
29Cudawuda & all, found an old article (1997) mentioning the interest of sugarCrossy-12/6/2002
28Cudawuda, longterm $20 is indeed a possibility but my 52week target is around $6Crossy-12/4/2002
27Nice continuing advance today over 3.00. What's your target, Crossy? Any chPatentlawmeister-12/4/2002
26Cudawuda, sorry I thought that emoticon ): was to imply an ironic connetation. OCrossy-12/3/2002
25I looked at the numbers when you first posted and agreed wholeheartedly that witPatentlawmeister-12/3/2002
24Cudawuda, AMEX minimum bidprice requirement is $3, NasdaqNM is $5 but in a proloCrossy-12/3/2002
23Crossy - when do you expect this co. to go back to the big board (would expect iPatentlawmeister-12/3/2002
22Don't sell your IPSU shares !! Don't go for cheapo. The stock has to brCrossy-12/3/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):