SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
TD Waterhouse Group (TWE)
An SI Board Since April 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1413 22 0 TWE
Emcee:  Beltropolis Boy Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
463 HI BC, I guess we should leave that to Chris Mataka since he started this threaOldAIMGuy-6/24/1999
462 thanks for the post, ron. fwiw, here's another bit o' news. ----- &lBeltropolis Boy-6/24/1999
461 Globe & Mail ( Canada ) Foul-up delays TD unit's TSE debut Printer erRon Schier-6/24/1999
460 I trade actively and have used Waterhouse for 4 years. I find their service excBill C.-6/24/1999
459 I've also been with Waterhouse since '94 and have been satisfied with tFrank Williams-6/24/1999
458 Yep all I got was 100 shares which I flipped at the open for a $50 profit. I goLABMAN-6/23/1999
457 Adding 10 million shares at the last moment didn't help either. However..IMoneysmith-6/23/1999
456 zeren, i haven't had too many problems myself, HOWEVER, their customer serMichael W. Brom-6/23/1999
455 JPM Sorry for your bad experiences. I almost never had problem with Waterhouse.zyx1996-6/23/1999
454 You are absolutely right. I've been comparing Etrade and DLJ - I think I&#HVN-6/23/1999
453 Total number is shares is 365 million. Check their statement. HVN-6/23/1999
452 The 9% appreciation is not the issue. What bothers me is that they got greedHVN-6/23/1999
451 (Sigh) Thanks Harry. Joseph Francis Torti-6/23/1999
450 <i>>>>>Can anybody give me the post # of the post that show aHarry Sharp-6/23/1999
449 Not really John they where hoping for a marketwatch like stock rise and it didnJoseph Francis Torti-6/23/1999
448 Labman, looks like your up crap creek now for the future ipo. And all for a loJoseph Francis Torti-6/23/1999
447 It's amazing what people are willing to pay for Waterhouse these days... 3 JPM-6/23/1999
446 mact, I didn't get a prospectus on the Waterhouse ipo. Probably explains Joseph Francis Torti-6/23/1999
445 I second the thanks to Jill. Thanks also to Tom for getting with Jill on the tbc_mack-6/23/1999
444 I wonder if it would make a diff. or not if waterhouse was trading on Nasdaq flsteve nguyen-6/23/1999
443 Now wasn't that nice of Jill and the gang to attach the ticker, etc. to theOldAIMGuy-6/23/1999
442 IPO is 12.4% of the outstanding, and the whole float. Confluence-6/23/1999
441 The IPO is 12 percent of the float......Robert-6/23/1999
440 TWE opened like a WET FART stinky smelly and flat all i got was 100 lousy shareLABMAN-6/23/1999
439 joseph, if u would have read the prospectus u would see that even before the mact-6/23/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News