SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm(QCOM) -> SpinCo
An SI Board Since July 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
172 51 0
Emcee:  w molloy Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
47<<i>The company already has gotten rid of most of its core businesses, Maurice Winn-7/28/2000
46>> SPINCO will need to do an acquisition.... Who do you think are the canw molloy-7/28/2000
45The shape of things to come? 3Com -> PALM final distribution, cost basis, andw molloy-7/28/2000
44Sell offs to continue? (copy on another Q thread as well) (thanks to phillips Jeff Vayda-7/28/2000
43Now let's see which player's GSM IPR will have the honor to be infringedmightylakers-7/28/2000
42SPINCO will need to do an acquisition in order to get the GSM RF expirenced engiGO*QCOM-7/28/2000
41Front Cover of IBD Story on Nokia and mention of analysts have speculated that aGO*QCOM-7/28/2000
40July 27, 2000 SMARTMONEY.COM Freedom to Compete By Alec Appelbaum HISTORICALLY, GO*QCOM-7/28/2000
39Pass, <<, rename the old company IPO it again>> Not at all, this is samim anbarcioglu-7/28/2000
38Barry - your spam on this an other threads has been reported to SI Admin Have aw molloy-7/27/2000
37Will the new Qualcomm entice investors? By Corey Grice Staff Writer, CNETRuffian-7/27/2000
36Like IDC? eomRuffian-7/27/2000
35You seem to have much more credibility than your first post would indicate. WhiDownSouth-7/27/2000
34OPTC...today only...watch for run after hours... look at this news.. 11.5M salesSober-7/27/2000
33cfoe, It appears that qcom is in a very strong negotiating position. It also apWebster-7/27/2000
32I bought QCOM when it was $8 about 2 years ago. Sold some in March and all latelpass pass-7/27/2000
31pass, I haven't seen you around any of the QCOM threads before. Obvious (toDownSouth-7/27/2000
30Qualcomm to Spinco, rename the old company IPO it again, what a scam! I'm nopass pass-7/27/2000
29Thanks a lot. This is beginning to come together for me. Rickwaverider-7/27/2000
28w, Randall answered the question as I would have. This really was a coup in theCooters-7/27/2000
27<If MOT make CDMA ASIC's will they have to pay QCOM too, even if they areqorilla_watcher-7/27/2000
26I think the intention is that NOBODY pays royalties to SPINCO. Spinco uses the Claude-7/27/2000
25<i>If Samdung buy SpinCo chips, will they have to pony up additional moneyRandall Knight-7/27/2000
24SJ Mercury "Qualcomm to spin off cell-chips line" mercurycenter.com w molloy-7/27/2000
23Some more about Spinco on the QUALCOMM web page Spinco Investor Q & A and tS100-7/27/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):