SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
6710 8 0
Emcee:  Cisco Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4710Everyone assumes Nikki Clark will side with Gore because she is black and was paCarolyn-12/4/2000
4709I got less than 33%. I tried to ascribe the more intelligent sounding views to Ilaine-12/4/2000
4708<i>Everything hinges now on Judge Nikki Clark. Will she throw out thousandThe Philosopher-12/4/2000
4707They were in port after an extended cruise ( I think a med run which is 6 monthsOral Roberts-12/4/2000
4706Here is my thought about why the Supreme Court was able to get a unanimous decisIlaine-12/4/2000
4705No need for a rehash, I guess all I want to know is whether it's open to legValley Girl-12/4/2000
4704How did she get there in the first place? and if it cost the Captain his job, whTraderGreg-12/4/2000
4703<i> There were all sorts of nasty things said about Katherine HarrisThe Philosopher-12/4/2000
4702Your right I was toast on that test. And you would make a good straight, but heOral Roberts-12/4/2000
4701Just getting back on the net, I was at the office and now am home. Don't knIlaine-12/4/2000
4700In response to Judge Sauls' ruling that a partial recount is not allowed undchomolungma-12/4/2000
4699Hi jttmab, I didn't want you to miss this view, from rather closer to yourRaymond Duray-12/4/2000
4698Jeff, This is like the perfect straight line. I can't pass this up. Sorry &jttmab-12/4/2000
4697I just watched the re-run of Judge Saul's reading of his order on C-SPAN, foIlaine-12/4/2000
4696<i>You must be talking about the piles of it in the field</i> How dOral Roberts-12/4/2000
4695Hi CB, Re: <i>So my chocolate cravings have been satiated.:) </i> Raymond Duray-12/4/2000
4694I guess that I made mention of the incident on the Finback, I should post links.Oral Roberts-12/4/2000
4693<i>We are much better at sorting through the BS.</i> You must be tajttmab-12/4/2000
4692I believe the simplest answer is the best one...the court wants to ensure their Dave-12/4/2000
4691Probably by a few extremists. But many will be watching their subsequent cases. Carolyn-12/4/2000
4690There were all sorts of nasty things said about Katherine Harris, even down to ichomolungma-12/4/2000
4689An honest station for once.Carolyn-12/4/2000
4688I was on a fast attack. Big and black and never come back:) USS Finback SSN-67Oral Roberts-12/4/2000
4687I think in this case the Court, correctly, believes that it is important for a ljttmab-12/4/2000
4686The Fox News' take on the U.S. Supreme Court ruling: "Supreme Court techomolungma-12/4/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News