SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2

An SI Board Since April 2001

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
5315	66	0

Emcee: Neenny	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
4740	<i>As for SI's subscription being construed as a contract to allow pos	The Philosopher	-	8/31/2003
4739	The CDA has nothing to do with it. I was mentioning the CDA there in response t	SI Bob	-	8/31/2003
4738	Keep in mind that iHub is not "pay to post". Payment there enables pr	SI Bob	-	8/31/2003
4737	<<I have answered every question that I plan to.>> Then you have an	bob	-	8/31/2003
4736	Please use the following text as reference. . Message #4719 from Kerry J. Carmic	d:oug	-	8/31/2003
4735	<i>Now, are you going to answer Christopher's questions, brownie?</	Phil(bullrider)	-	8/31/2003
4734	Not at all... Matt suspended/terminated my first account for asking Jenna quest	bob	-	8/31/2003
4733	bob, For some reason I remember that you were booted from Ihub. Care to disclo	Phil(bullrider)	-	8/31/2003
4732	<<And is no ones business except Bux and Matt>> And it seems you	bob	-	8/30/2003
4731	CH, I paid the same amount to post on Ihub that Bux did. Knowing the history,	Phil(bullrider)	-	8/30/2003
4730	I disagree, which is the only reason I'm spending any time at all discussing	The Philosopher	-	8/30/2003
4729	Depends on whether he wants to toss $10,000 or more at the problem without certa	The Philosopher	-	8/30/2003
4728	CH, <i>But in all the dozens of posts since Bux first posted, that simple	Phil(bullrider)	-	8/30/2003
4727	CH, <i>There are aspects of the contractual relationship which go beyond	Phil(bullrider)	-	8/30/2003
4726	Kerry, <i> Whomever (Bob or whoever) mistakenly referenced the Act with r	Phil(bullrider)	-	8/30/2003
4725	<i>(By the way, I'm not saying that Bux's post was an actual viola	The Philosopher	-	8/30/2003
4724	<i>You seem to be challenging Matt's ability to prevent Bux from posti	The Philosopher	-	8/30/2003
4723	<i>Now, are we in agreement of that or not? If not, why not?</i> N	The Philosopher	-	8/30/2003
4722	I'm right with you in not taking sides, in having no interest in IDCC, and i	The Philosopher	-	8/30/2003
4721	Okay, Phil... Now I understand. Yes, that is correct. The Communications Decenc	EL KABONG!!!	-	8/30/2003
4720	Kerry, <i>I'm not sure what you mean by the phrase "the act"	Phil(bullrider)	-	8/30/2003
4719	Hi Phil, I'm not sure what you mean by the phrase "the act". Shou	EL KABONG!!!	-	8/30/2003
4718	CH, <i> a member having paid for the right to post has the right to conti	Phil(bullrider)	-	8/30/2003
4717	Kerry, The reason I asked whether or not you had been following the thread was	Phil(bullrider)	-	8/30/2003
4716	bob, There is not enough bullshit in the world to make your cup overflow. Have	Phil(bullrider)	-	8/30/2003

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):