SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Silkroad
An SI Board Since November 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
626 32 0
Emcee:  ahhaha Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
476 There was no evidence that it was. They don't want to look bad because theyahhaha-8/11/1999
475 I was not questioning your post #471. I was wondering whether you (or others) fSrexley-8/10/1999
474 I think that what I stated in #471 is still correct. ahhaha-8/10/1999
473 The following excerpt from today's Reuters story on SGI's restructuringSrexley-8/10/1999
472 Hi Kachina, try to do this: make a function equal to 1 on [0,1], zero outsideEPS-8/9/1999
471 SGI is a very interesting possibility in many ways. They are where NOVL was twoahhaha-8/8/1999
470 Lots of speculation here about how the product will fit in. Does anyone have anSrexley-8/8/1999
469 Hi Jay, long time no (virtual) see! You're quite right, lossy compression oftth-8/7/1999
468 Isn't wavelet compression unsuitable for network traffic because it is inheJay Lowe-8/6/1999
467 OK, not sure this is the type of thing you're wondering about, but for examftth-8/6/1999
466 Dave, w.r.t. fractal-/wavelet- encoding, if I could have phrased it better, I wFrank A. Coluccio-8/6/1999
465 << Anyone care to speculate on the use of fractals in the encoding multimftth-8/6/1999
464 Wavelets... from my limited understanding of them, were what I was referring toFrank A. Coluccio-8/6/1999
463 <i>".. in other words this fits the textbook definition of a discontFrank A. Coluccio-8/6/1999
462 Hi Frank, I would tend to think that wavelets would be a more likely long termKachina-8/6/1999
461 I don't know what optical CDMA is. It sounds like it would be inherently inahhaha-8/6/1999
460 You have it wrong. It is eminently compatible with existing systems. SRSC takesahhaha-8/6/1999
459 You take your raw RF input and embed a clock sampled frequency onto it into an ahhaha-8/6/1999
458 Dave, what a pleasant revelation: Optical CDMA. Every time I've mentioned tFrank A. Coluccio-8/6/1999
457 These guys at CTC have been quiet for a while...anyone following them to know hftth-8/6/1999
456 re: <<Each component channel carries a unique designation so it is easy tftth-8/6/1999
455 Hi Frank, so in other words this fits the textbook definition of a discontinuouftth-8/6/1999
454 It sure is fun to try to understand these things with nothing available to defiahhaha-8/6/1999
453 <i>"They've stepped out of the shadows and fired a giant salvo.&Frank A. Coluccio-8/5/1999
452 I guess we now know what they've been doing over the last six months. They&ahhaha-8/5/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):