SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
ISSM
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5211 10 0 ISSM
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4861 Stephan, I don't think that these guys ever had a clue as to how to go abouGuinnessGuy-10/23/1997
4860 Not a penny stock, but if you like Kopin you should investigate Microvision IncRobert Faust-10/23/1997
4859 Maybe we still have a chance ... (well wisher...) This company was in the red Step1-10/22/1997
4858 Fly by night but not especially good at what they do ... >>> In 1996,Step1-10/22/1997
4857 Loren and All: Looks like B. Terry and Co. have resurfaced with the issuance ofGuinnessGuy-10/22/1997
4856 I'm with Scott on the UNRG ride and what a ride its been. Wouldn't necLoren S.-10/17/1997
4855 Mitch, I partially wised up and sold half my ISSM at .40 & moved it into UNScott H. Davis-10/15/1997
4854 What keeps ISSM from falling to 1/32, as most losers do? Ok, mitch, happy timeStock Puppy-10/15/1997
4853 Twelve days of silence, over 4800 posts, five cents. Should have bailed at 8 cmitch bailey-10/15/1997
4852 To All, for the unfortunite few who don't have a lot of shares, yet those aScott H. Davis-10/2/1997
4851 Mitch and Cathi: Only consolation is that the tax man cometh very soon now. I Lee Bush-10/2/1997
4850 Thanks, Cathi, again for your expertise and experience here. I did not know, umitch bailey-10/2/1997
4849 Mitch: They haven't filed a quarterly or annual report since they filed laCathi Wierzbicki-10/2/1997
4848 This sounds like an autopsy. We are now without any sources of information, emitch bailey-10/2/1997
4847 Loren: Those are difficult questions to answer with any certainty. I don'Cathi Wierzbicki-10/2/1997
4846 Whatever impetus was pushing the stock up to the $.15 level seems to be gone asLoren S.-10/2/1997
4845 Bob: May be a little too soon (even now) to invest in any "scaleup."Cathi Wierzbicki-9/29/1997
4844 ... GAD had/has no ability to mass produce low cost gallium arsenide diodes. Bubob mackey-9/29/1997
4843 Bob: I sure would have gotten out if only someone would have clued me in that Cathi Wierzbicki-9/28/1997
4842 > Who would have guessed? Only the insiders truly knew what was happening. bob mackey-9/28/1997
4841 Who would have guessed? Only the insiders truly knew what was happening. At tLoren S.-9/23/1997
4840 Cathi: I see. Well, at least it was a gain that you gave up. Some of us neveDavid Bogdanoff-9/23/1997
4839 David: It isn't nostalgia that keeps me interested in ISSM. ISSM is by faCathi Wierzbicki-9/23/1997
4838 To all; Selling out the stock would signal that "they" have given upDavid Bogdanoff-9/22/1997
4837 Good Morning Stock Puppy: If it turns out that ISSM sells its corporate shell Cathi Wierzbicki-9/19/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):