SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates
An SI Board Since February 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
54805 618 0
Emcee:  Uncle Frank Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
53105While we're on the subject of CDMA, can someone please explain the importancMike Buckley-11/20/2002
53104Jim, <i>Is it possible to put everything on one chip, and with Qualcomm cMike Buckley-11/20/2002
53103Paul, I want to make sure I understand you. I think you're saying that theMike Buckley-11/20/2002
53102Paul: Hey, I follow WiFi as closely as I can and expect good - very good - resulgdichaz-11/20/2002
53101Cha2, The key is understanding the difference between sustaining and disruptivepaul_philp-11/20/2002
53100Paul: We are cross posting. I do not disagree on the huge future you see for Wigdichaz-11/20/2002
53099Chaz2, Paul, Mike – One Chip Chaz2 wrote- “Qualcomm will have WiFi in its one Jim Mullens-11/20/2002
53098Cha2, Hey, this is nothing personal! I am sure that Qualcomm will be able to dpaul_philp-11/20/2002
53097Cha2, Let me be more precise. There is a 2D matrix for applications (low to hipaul_philp-11/20/2002
53096Paul: Again, you have my great respect for your analytical skills and savvy. I gdichaz-11/20/2002
53095Paul, Chaz2, Mike- Good discussion. Chaz2 wrote- “And no way are we dealing wJim Mullens-11/20/2002
53094<I> Or will you pull your ubiquitious device out of your pocket, click a fpaul_philp-11/20/2002
53093Paul: Again we are probably much closer than all this back and forth would indicgdichaz-11/20/2002
53092Paul, <i>Further, I don't assume general purpose devices that are easMike Buckley-11/20/2002
53091Paul:<< My main argument is that both worlds will co-exist. I think the prgdichaz-11/20/2002
53090Mike, I think we might be in heated agreement. I agree that WiFi is early in tpaul_philp-11/20/2002
53089Kat, <i> Cell phones, pdas,palm PCs, tablet PCs and all the other devicesMike Buckley-11/20/2002
53088<I> the Qualcomm equipped handset will have it all and should be able to spaul_philp-11/20/2002
53087>>People eventually aren't going to be satisfied with having to wanderareokat-11/20/2002
53086Paul, you wrote- “ My conclusion is that neither WiFi nor CDMA is sufficient foJim Mullens-11/20/2002
53085<i>Apollo hasn't posted here since last February, but I'll drop hiareokat-11/20/2002
53084<I> People eventually aren't going to be satisfied with having to wandpaul_philp-11/20/2002
53083Paul, I believe you're still thinking too narrowly in defining Qualcomm'Mike Buckley-11/20/2002
53082Thanks Paul- I consider this a MAJOR win for our side, the "good guys"Jim Mullens-11/20/2002
53081I Was Wrong About Qualcomm. radio.weblogs.com In this era of ubiquitous real-tpaul_philp-11/20/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News