SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Banned.......Replies to the A@P thread.
An SI Board Since May 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
5425 102 0
Emcee:  Shoot1st Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5325Mr. Scottonstocks, Will you be among the top 5 with a smile on your face if Mr.just_a_question-3/22/2006
5324Here are some stats on criminal appeals - average for total reversal is only 2%,Dale Baker-3/22/2006
5323Don't tell his sheep that. I'm sure at least one might be willing to greSmiling Bob-3/22/2006
53225 to 15 if he's lucky. 10 to 30 if the judge didn't get laid.nowandthen-3/22/2006
5321I'll take 10 years for the RICO, time served for the stock stuff and 2-5 forDale Baker-3/22/2006
5320Is there a pool? I think 10 years, less the time served now for this one. Of couBill Ulrich-3/22/2006
5319So what's your prediction for his sentence? I don't have a clue what migJeffrey S. Mitchell-3/22/2006
5318I have a small satchel of beef jerky which i could send. Would He <i>like&Bill Ulrich-3/22/2006
5317What time is it scheduled to begin?Dale Baker-3/22/2006
5316As far as I know, yes. If so, I'm planning to attend, but I'm sure the dJeffrey S. Mitchell-3/21/2006
5315If I were Judge Dearie I would proclaim enough is enough, the taxpayers have sheDale Baker-3/21/2006
5314vegas line says no sentencing March 22nd +500 another delay -1000Bear Down-3/21/2006
5313So is the sentencing still on for the 22nd?Dale Baker-3/21/2006
5312Might it also mean the informal interjection into a very formal process? Poor Eljust_a_question-3/21/2006
5311This sounds all too familiar. I really think Amr has lost it. He can't get aSmiling Bob-3/21/2006
5310<i> << Rebuked and rebuffed It is not clear how much time Judge DearDaiTN-3/21/2006
5309That's the problem with real courtrooms, hostile counsel asking you all thosDale Baker-3/21/2006
5308They didn't argue for "change of venue" early enough. The trial reBill Ulrich-3/21/2006
5307I can only guess that Tony has always scraped by using his fast tongue to spin pDale Baker-3/21/2006
5306With the great success of the recent (and egregious) banning spree employed by &Bill Ulrich-3/21/2006
5305Anthnoy steps in it again - breaks the rules to promote his cause and just pisseDale Baker-3/21/2006
5304radio editClase Azul-3/20/2006
5303Reality bites sometimes, doesn't it, Man? Wasn't Anthony big on showing Dale Baker-3/20/2006
5302Sorry, Peter, my post speaks for itself. Sometimes, it's better to leave it rrufff-3/19/2006
5301didn't you post this? "There are others who could be considered "peter michaelson-3/19/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News