SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates
An SI Board Since February 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
54805 618 0
Emcee:  Uncle Frank Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
53405UF - HELP SOFTWARE - Has anyone seen some software that shows you what your complimtex-1/9/2003
53404<I>Was it worth it?</i> Yup ... my time is expensive ...Thomas Mercer-Hursh-1/9/2003
53403OT? Thomas, >To me, the difference between having to break for lunch >tJurgis Bekepuris-1/9/2003
53402Apollo, A very fine telling of the Rambus case sans religion. A refreshing chapaul_philp-1/9/2003
53401<I>but do they matter?</i> Of course, the answer is yes and no. MyThomas Mercer-Hursh-1/9/2003
53400Maybe we'll be seeing more partnering of Moore and Wiefels or Moore and KippMike Buckley-1/9/2003
53399Thanks for your balanced response since the Rambus thread has been corrupted by Gary L. Kepler-1/9/2003
53398Link to article by Moore and Wiefels. I don't think it's been posted heareokat-1/9/2003
53397<i>"correct me if I am wrong"......</i> Ok, let me try thApollo-1/9/2003
53396Thomas, OK, I see. I guess what I am thinking about is that it is quite difficuJurgis Bekepuris-1/9/2003
53395Here is an article by Markman that talks about WiFi involved companies. moneyceareokat-1/9/2003
53394<i>1. Tech is definitely coming back.</i> We're not going anywhDealer-1/9/2003
53393Harry Newton provides a report from the field... <<...8:30 AM. Thursday, stockman_scott-1/9/2003
53392If Carl Bilow is to be believed on the Rambus thread (and I gather that he has cGary L. Kepler-1/8/2003
53391Scott- I see Qualcomm made the list again - at no. 18- Rank Company U.S. emplJim Mullens-1/8/2003
53390<I>If so, how do you see it?</i> In following the benchmarks, partiThomas Mercer-Hursh-1/8/2003
53389Thomas, Care to elaborate? Are you saying that non-Rambus memory with 2.5GHz CPJurgis Bekepuris-1/8/2003
53388<I>I don't know what the technical issues are, but the historic contenThomas Mercer-Hursh-1/8/2003
53387Tech Companies See Bush Plan On Dividends as Troublesome By Jonathan Krim Washistockman_scott-1/8/2003
53386Companies that don't lay off rise in Fortune rankings Valued employers By stockman_scott-1/8/2003
53385<i>still pending issues: 1. litigation on claims that Rambus is owed royalEnricoPalazzo-1/8/2003
53384<<...great. all we need to do is make cell-phone usage, storage, CRM, and stockman_scott-1/7/2003
53383great. all we need to do is make cell-phone usage, storage, CRM, and other such tekboy-1/7/2003
53382Frank... I need new glasses and some time off. I first thought you were talkingchaz-1/7/2003
53381Nah, they're both low tech users. Besides, if the load gets too heavy, I caUncle Frank-1/7/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):