SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The Boxing Ring Revived
An SI Board Since October 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
7720 16 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5400Happened upon this column and the bolded part made me think of you... Oil-FueleLane3-3/10/2003
5399nopeone_less-3/10/2003
5398Partial-Birth Rerun Monday, March 10, 2003; Page A20 WE ARE ABOUT to enter aLane3-3/10/2003
5397Alleged snow, my foot. It was at LEAST 1/4 inch deep on the front lawn. ActualThe Philosopher-3/10/2003
5396<i>Egad. When did you pick my wife's brain? </i> Didn't picLane3-3/10/2003
5395I think that we're done with the snow here and spring is around the corner, Lane3-3/10/2003
5394You're on the right side of the issue. There's a vast difference betweeThe Philosopher-3/10/2003
5393<i> My first message was to Chris, on whom that tone is generally effThe Philosopher-3/10/2003
5392Take heart. One out of two ain't bad.The Philosopher-3/10/2003
5391Sorry. I had already called it off, and decided not to respond to any more inanThe Philosopher-3/10/2003
5390<i>"What form of electricity production would you have the US switch Solon-3/10/2003
5389I don't support hate crime laws, but I was asking Solon about how they are aTimF-3/10/2003
5388<i>"Peter Stock seems to imply that there is a danger of such arrestsone_less-3/10/2003
5387<i>"Can you get arrested in Canada for using an ethnic slur or wearinSolon-3/10/2003
5386<i>"I'm sorry about the tonme</i>" I appreciate the cSolon-3/10/2003
5385They should of course be protected from mass murder (I don't know if the criTimF-3/10/2003
5384Ok. I'll keep a watch for examples also. I may have exaggerated the problem one_less-3/10/2003
5383<i>It seems like the word comes out a lot as tool of the left extremists tLane3-3/10/2003
5382<i>"Perhaps one of those was the context for the charge of intolerancone_less-3/10/2003
5381I wasn't considering efficiency in terms of dollars, although more efficientTimF-3/10/2003
5380I'm sorry about the tone. My first message was to Chris, on whom that tone Lane3-3/10/2003
5379<i>The word intolerant was used a while back to describe people who supporLane3-3/10/2003
5378<i>"Sigh!</i>" <b>"Can it, please</b>&qSolon-3/10/2003
5377<i>"Now, OTOH, if you are cowed by a name-caller when the accusation one_less-3/10/2003
5376Sigh!Lane3-3/10/2003
5375Ditto to you. I responded to a post. Period. If you do not respond to posts thSolon-3/10/2003
5374<i>Personally I don't tolerate that kind of behavior when I have any iLane3-3/10/2003
5373<i>"However, not all who don't want to be labeled "intoleranone_less-3/10/2003
5372Ditto to you. Can it, please. This squabble is a lame surrogate for something Lane3-3/10/2003
5371<i>I hear your babysitter calling you for your nap. </i> Will you tLane3-3/10/2003
5370<i>Some members of adult society are more afraid of being labeled 'intLane3-3/10/2003
5369<i>"I hear your babysitter calling you for your nap.</i>" Solon-3/10/2003
5368<b>Clap, clap, clap!!...;-)</b> You certainly have wonderful <i&Solon-3/10/2003
5367I hear your babysitter calling you for your nap.The Philosopher-3/10/2003
5366So much for the staid British, news.independent.co.ukThe Philosopher-3/10/2003
5365A typically lame response from a person short on reason, but long on mouth. ClaSolon-3/10/2003
5364Better get your half.com orders in fast. According to the WSJ, Ebay is going tThe Philosopher-3/10/2003
5363That is good to know...and appreciated.Solon-3/10/2003
5362<i>"The higher cost means demand goes down when you charge higher priSolon-3/10/2003
5361Typical. Don't address the facts, attack the messenger.The Philosopher-3/10/2003
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News