SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Should Clinton resign?
An SI Board Since September 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
567 2 0
Emcee:  cool Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
542 Okay MrKnowItAll, what part don't you understand? Impeachment is *NOT* juMikeyB-9/24/1998
541 Oh dear. Another futile attempt. Message 5829588 Mr. K. mrknowitall-9/24/1998
540 Good, we're agreed, on the right to know congressional candidates' opinDaniel Schuh-9/24/1998
539 I'm gonna butt in here just to put my two pennies in. The answer is YES. MikeyB-9/24/1998
538 Oh dear. One more futile attempt. Do the voters have the right to know whetherDaniel Schuh-9/24/1998
537 Dan - If the candidate has already made up their mind as to grounds, their consmrknowitall-9/24/1998
536 Uh huh. One more try. Do the voters have the right to know whether the candidDaniel Schuh-9/24/1998
535 Dan, what that means is that no incumbent can yet make a determination as to whmrknowitall-9/24/1998
534 Interesting. I'm not quiet sure where this "knowing the unknowable&quDaniel Schuh-9/23/1998
533 Dan. Clearly and precisely - No. There is no right to know the unknowable. Tmrknowitall-9/23/1998
532 Ok, mrknowitall, you cleverly picked the wrong question to answer directly. SoDaniel Schuh-9/23/1998
531 Dan: At the risk of raising your blood pressure, re: "<i>Is there pmrknowitall-9/23/1998
530 What point? The point you want to argue? Who elected you? I did not accuse aDaniel Schuh-9/23/1998
529 Dan, re: the source of your confusion. You refuse to argue the point. You acmrknowitall-9/23/1998
528 Huh? I'm confused on this debate tactics issue, this sure looks like an ad Daniel Schuh-9/23/1998
527 Dan, no, what I was pointing out that you and bubba use the same "debate&qmrknowitall-9/23/1998
526 Uh, no, but what's your argument anyway? That Carville's political, anDaniel Schuh-9/23/1998
525 Dan - do you write <i>for</i> Jim Carville or just copy your text fmrknowitall-9/23/1998
524 Give me a break Ken Starr does not work for the republicans....They did not dicCraig K-9/22/1998
523 Mike, You got it, that is the point. He isn't any better or worst than youJack Mills-9/22/1998
522 <i>Re: "Our republic has a few people in positions of enormous and rJames A. Shankland-9/22/1998
521 <i>What's the difference? This is a precedent setting incident. If heDaniel Schuh-9/22/1998
520 Re: "Our republic has a few people in positions of enormous and relativelMikeyB-9/22/1998
519 <i> the democrats instituted the Independent council statute, and until tJames A. Shankland-9/22/1998
518 If a President *WILLFULLY* violates his oath of office, would that be impeachaMikeyB-9/22/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News