SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Rande Is . . . HOME
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
57584 486 0
Emcee:  Rande Is Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
57409The Senate voted Thursday to allow the national debt to swell to nearly $9 trillBucky Katt-3/16/2006
57408When the dollar dumps v the Ruble, ouch> Dollar plummets nearly 20 kopecks ahBucky Katt-3/15/2006
57407Treasury Secretary John Snow warns Congress: US government's cash running ouBucky Katt-3/14/2006
57406Although there are many different "extenuating circumstances", the Chishadowman-3/14/2006
57405Interesting article on the Dubai/ports incident Smoot-Hawley's ghost lives dan6-3/13/2006
57404To make it simple, assume the US could, all of sudden, produce enough cheap fuelSteveinTX-3/10/2006
574032nd your idea of disengagement..and getting in further via Iran will only make ttsigprofit-3/10/2006
57402Yes, perhaps I was a bit harsh on the SI'rs. . .Sorry. I conversed with DavRande Is-3/9/2006
57401I didnt know radical Islam wanted to change America. Have you read Bin Laden'xcr600-3/9/2006
57400I continue to look at SI daily but am also a "grandfathered" member. Michael Hart-3/9/2006
57399Interest groups may be there but big Oil has megabucks.. far more than any interMike da bear-3/9/2006
57398I'm not green enough to believe that as one person I have much if any influeD_I_R_T-3/9/2006
57397I'm glad you wrote to your senator on this concept. Now who has more influenMike da bear-3/9/2006
57396Patrick, I agree with your "Manhatten Project" idea. I wrote to one oD_I_R_T-3/9/2006
57395I agree, the proper way to deal with the terrorism issue is to disengage from thRock_nj-3/9/2006
57394Too many people have been "arguing", "discussing" this topicBob-3/9/2006
57393Thanks, Bob. I'm flattered. PatPJr-3/9/2006
57392Pat: Just had to tell you. Your last 3 posts here rank up there as some of the Bob-3/9/2006
57391I'm not an odds maker but I suppose the odds for the world to change to the PJr-3/9/2006
57390What are the odds the world is going to change in the way we want, or think it wBucky Katt-3/9/2006
57389Bucky, It is convoluted, isn't it. I can't disagree with your concern PJr-3/9/2006
57388The entire issue is so convoluted none of it makes much sense. The only truth thBucky Katt-3/9/2006
57387"The world situation makes me think of the old joke, (everything reminds mePJr-3/9/2006
57386Pat - You've obviously thought this through a lot deeper than I have and thedan6-3/9/2006
57385It could be that the US needs the UAE as a staging area for Iran contingencies. PJr-3/8/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):