SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
General Lithography
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1305 39 0
Emcee:  Andrew Vance Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
605 Crossy- My two cents. 248 DuV, with a full-blown set of "tricks" (Punotooth-9/15/1997
604 Andrew, concerning Your General Lithography company list, why not include COHR Crossy-9/13/1997
603 Dear Andrew, fist let me say that I really enjoy the incredible insight You andCrossy-9/13/1997
602 Cary, No argument whatsoever. There's room for more than 1 supplier. Ian@SI-9/12/1997
601 Ian, It was in jest, but I believe that Komatsu has customers for its lasers aCary Salsberg-9/12/1997
600 Cary, Was your note in jest, or did I say something to offend you? Ian.Ian@SI-9/12/1997
599 Cary, There are one or two other relevant facts in addition to my having beIan@SI-9/12/1997
598 Ian, Let me see if I really understand. YOU bought Cymer stock recently. CymeCary Salsberg-9/12/1997
597 Ritz, Re Komatsu: It's one thing to announce a product. It's anoIan@SI-9/12/1997
596 Robert: Yes you're right, they've claimed that they will reach 50/quarRitz-9/12/1997
595 Andrew, Yousef: I think the answer to the Cymer question is a very simple one.Ritz-9/12/1997
594 The following is the news release I was speaking about. Thanks go out to StAndrew Vance-9/12/1997
593 To ALL: Andrew didnt have the time to post so he asked me to copy and paste thSteven Messina,L.M.T.-9/12/1997
592 I won't be giving up SI as I go to greener pastures. As a matter of fact, IAndrew Vance-9/12/1997
591 Your comments are always well received and evaluated. I think we are on the saAndrew Vance-9/12/1997
590 Andrew...not to beat a dead horse, and I'm CERTAINLY NOT disagreeing with yLLCF-9/12/1997
589 Andrew Try this link for your patent search: patent.womplex.ibm.com I hope yoDefrocked-9/12/1997
588 <i> Is it possible that production problems with the new tool are the cauAndrew Vance-9/11/1997
587 Andrew, I disagree! While we have speculated on 200 systems at $7M a throw, eCary Salsberg-9/11/1997
586 Robert-Thanks for the links on the ISI items. I must have missed them and reallAndrew Vance-9/11/1997
585 So I should take the bet???<GGG> Nice bit of research on your part and Andrew Vance-9/11/1997
584 Actually, we as a group have made it out to be a big deal. We have, on numerousAndrew Vance-9/11/1997
583 <RE:Nikon push-out> Maybe its a lens related problem??? DAKLLCF-9/11/1997
582 I cant agree more about SVGI value and what it says about "micrascan"LLCF-9/11/1997
581 Ritz, SVGL is planning to make 50+ a quarter in '98. At least, this is whFJB-9/11/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):