SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
KEMET Corp.
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
906 12 0 KEME
Emcee:  techtonicbull Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
631Top line growth drives earnings per share not artificial company buy backs. I jutechtonicbull-9/4/2000
630We will all see for 100% sure when the next quarterly report is issued. It shoulBWAC-9/4/2000
629Anything is possible, but I would be VERY surprised. If the recent price rise iWTMHouston-9/4/2000
628I believe that KEM has abought back almost all of the 4MM shares. Look at the votechtonicbull-9/4/2000
627How about those of you that think that KEM is out there buying any stock, much lWTMHouston-9/4/2000
626Ron its OK. You were talking to the "janitor" at KEMET.techtonicbull-9/4/2000
625Wow, this thread got ugly quick. Prophet, you need to relax, you can't takAll Mtn Ski-9/4/2000
624It is true that I have no idea who I was talking to. (And he didn't know whoRon Harvey-9/4/2000
623It is my understanding that corporations use general worded statements when discJeffrey E. Klein-9/4/2000
622The Prophet wants to report you to KEM IR. I imagine he will do this. I think thtechtonicbull-9/4/2000
621The odds are high that Mr. Harvey was lying. The only question is whether to reThe Prophet-9/4/2000
620Whoa! Prophet. Ron Harvey may have spoken to the janitor at the Kemet headquartetechtonicbull-9/3/2000
619You are a liar.The Prophet-9/3/2000
618Not angry in the least Ron. I just cannot believe that there is a better way fortechtonicbull-9/3/2000
617You certainly seem upset about this. To repeat, I can't recall the name. SecRon Harvey-9/3/2000
616Still unsubstantiated IR person talking off the top of his head about a buyback techtonicbull-9/3/2000
615<<When did you call investor relations? Friday 9/1? If so, I think they miRon Harvey-9/3/2000
614IR told you they haven't bought yet? I would like more details of whom you stechtonicbull-9/2/2000
613I am skeptical about your purported conversation with IR.The Prophet-9/2/2000
612Ron, When did you call investor relations? Friday 9/1? If so, I think they miSJS-9/2/2000
611<<I would be surprised to see KEM buy 200K shares by the end of the year aRon Harvey-9/2/2000
610Tech, You and I agree. I think they went to work immediately on their stock, oSJS-9/1/2000
609RE the buyback program I respectfully disagree. I believe that the volume yestertechtonicbull-9/1/2000
608So tantalums are essential in certain applications and designs and not as easilytechtonicbull-9/1/2000
607Ron: I agree. I could believe that they may have bought 10K or so shares, justWTMHouston-9/1/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News