SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Emulex, What Prospects?
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
788 52 0 EMLX
Emcee:  Clive Miller Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
638Jason - What if you logged on, saw EMLX down 40, go to Briefing.com and see the James Burke-8/26/2000
637<i>But it still sucks for the people who got burned. It's just not howJack Hartmann-8/26/2000
636Did anyone buy EMLX before the halt? Be truthful, I bet there will be no responsRon Kline-8/26/2000
635I don't need bogus PR's, the WSJ tiny print for decimals already makes mSr K-8/26/2000
634I understand your attitude as it reflects ones personal attitude towards risk, vRockyBalboa-8/26/2000
633>>A broker who is not just an order taker has a first obligation to "Labrador-8/26/2000
632Jason, Good advice for the future. I think I remember some of my other techs stoJack Hartmann-8/26/2000
631>>You are correct Sir. The NASDAQ Market works poorly in nearly all situatLabrador-8/26/2000
630You're right. I'm a bleeding-heart liberal. I hope the newswires neverKevin McKenzie-8/26/2000
629<i>"But what happened was just not right. It wasn't like buying aStreet Hawk-8/26/2000
628Jason, Didn't mean to get you so defensive. You're right; my analogy iKevin McKenzie-8/26/2000
627<i>"Rescind all orders which occurred during the fraud."</i&gStreet Hawk-8/26/2000
626You missed my point, it appears. And don't go name calling, its not approSJS-8/26/2000
625Well, everyone thinks it was a "hoax." What if it wasn't? Maybe sofname-8/26/2000
624And NEVER place a market order when you are not continually monitoring the markeSr K-8/26/2000
623"But I still don't understand why EMLX did not open where it closed.&qudonjuan_demarco-8/26/2000
622Excellent answer thank you. I did not have emlx (and probably wont, as I considfreeus-8/26/2000
621<i>I don't remember any trades being canceled due to a hoax in recent Sr K-8/26/2000
620Very intelligent, well thought out reasoning. I'll bet you do a ton better ifreeus-8/26/2000
619EMLX didn't open where it closed because thousands of people stupidly placedMike E.-8/26/2000
618Steps used by myself and the folks I trade with to see this pr was BS: 1) the changedmyname-8/26/2000
617crooks all of them, GBoplicity-8/26/2000
616A broker who is not just an order taker has a first obligation to "know youSr K-8/26/2000
615re<i>what is wrong is the halt</i> I think I agree with that. I hearfreeus-8/26/2000
614re<i>luckily investing is a long term prospect</i> That's the stfreeus-8/26/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News