SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK
An SI Board Since August 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
67261 18 0
Emcee:  LesX Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
66661 The honorable thing for Norma to do is resign. JLAjlallen-4/6/2000
66660 AB- If he was in the military, he would deserve a court martial. ~H~haqihana-4/5/2000
66659 Yes, the hypocrisy of the Gummint is mind-boggling. G. W.George Coyne-4/5/2000
66658 Exactly, Brees. Correlation infers causation... right? According to A.B., wScarecrow-4/5/2000
66657 Now wait just a dang minute here. I know a guy who was working very diligently one_less-4/5/2000
66656 Bottom line: President Clinton HAS been Prez the last 7+ years. The man deservA. Borealis-4/5/2000
66655 <i>Stock market action the last 7+ years ? ? ? Stupid question......whicScarecrow-4/5/2000
66654 Stock market action the last 7+ years ? ? ? Stupid question......which even yoA. Borealis-4/5/2000
66653 <<The state sanction makes it a much more viable alternative for women neIsh-4/5/2000
66652 Well, I think they will. They generally take the road of least responsibility. one_less-4/5/2000
66651 Let them call it a dumpster issue. It's designed to help prevent dumpster bIsh-4/5/2000
66650 <<Is it whether the state lotteries encourage gambling?>> In IllinIsh-4/5/2000
66649 That seems very workable. This in fact may become a common scenario. I'm thone_less-4/5/2000
66648 <<If he knows that is what happened or knows where to look for an annonymIsh-4/5/2000
66647 Actually, I think we all agree. The only dissonant note was my mentioning that Neocon-4/5/2000
66646 I'm not sure exactly what is being debated. Is it whether the state lotteriDMaA-4/5/2000
66645 Good point. But I still don't see any reason for the bill to be written to one_less-4/5/2000
66644 That sounds very sociable. There is an essay by Charles Lamb, from the beginninNeocon-4/5/2000
66643 There's more than one bridge for money site. Players chat with each other aIsh-4/5/2000
66642 <<The problem I have is once it is sanctioned by legal language in a billIsh-4/5/2000
66641 <<-and fuck perverted attorneys!>> No, those and the crooked ones Ish-4/5/2000
66640 All I said was that I do not have the data to confirm or refute. I am, myself, Neocon-4/5/2000
66639 I think you are saying the same thing or something close to it. I have watched one_less-4/5/2000
66638 Where ya been, Johannes...?lorrie coey-4/5/2000
66637 I am saying no such thing.....I am merely saying that proponents are in no posiNeocon-4/5/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):