SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
uniView Technologies - UVEW
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
6895 7 0 UVEW
Emcee:  emichael Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6745 Is there anyone here going to the shareholders meeting 4:30 P.M. Dallas time toJoe Barker-1/28/1998
6744 [OFF TOPIC] Jon - It is a good site, but it might interest you to know that onjethro57-1/28/1998
6743 OFF Subject: [PRIVATE MESSAGE] Has anyone else noticed that you can now send aJoe Barker-1/28/1998
6742 Dec. 29, uniView signed a letter of intent. Jan. 5, uniView finalized terms ofJoe Barker-1/27/1998
6741 All the lawyers and accountants on both sides have to spend an inordinate amounSnakeInATuxedo-1/27/1998
6740 Here is a response to a question that I sent EDnet today. I asked them when doJoe Barker-1/27/1998
6739 Joe: Did we expect more from the people who bought us free couches and cheap suArt Yeap-1/27/1998
6738 Here is one of those great e-mails that I got from Neal last month. Notice hisJoe Barker-1/27/1998
6737 Steve, the symbol is just a change of letters. It has nothing to do with exchaJoe Barker-1/27/1998
6736 So what did we get, a one for one exchange of CRTM for UVEW? And why is UVEW uSteve Casey-1/27/1998
6735 Symbol change is not something that we have to vote on. They can change the syJoe Barker-1/27/1998
6734 Last 0 7/32 Net Change 0 Bid Jon Scott-1/27/1998
6733 Didn't realize the meeting and vote hadn't taken place. If trading undeJon Scott-1/27/1998
6732 If a third party is counting the votes, why are they giving out the results to Joe Barker-1/27/1998
6731 Of course the shareholders vote hold no weight. My point is they are not even Joe Barker-1/27/1998
6730 Joe, you should look at your proxy material. Where do you mail the proxy? TherJon Tara-1/27/1998
6729 Joe The individual shareholders have seen such dilution that our "NO"Jon Scott-1/27/1998
6728 After checking about 10 sites, 3 of them do not have UVEW on their data base. Joe Barker-1/27/1998
6727 Another screw-up! A symbol change is always a risk... people won't know whaJon Tara-1/27/1998
6726 Jon or anyone..........are you getting realtime quotes for UVEW? Datek is not Joe Barker-1/27/1998
6725 Joe, no - I was NOT referring to Curtis-Mathes! I was referring-to one of the Jon Tara-1/24/1998
6724 <i>"I know that a director of the company has for about a year been Joe Barker-1/24/1998
6723 Good summary! If the company officers' dominant overall experience involvesJon Scott-1/24/1998
6722 Wow, what a great site! It bears repeating: stockdetective.com Now, the ironyJon Tara-1/24/1998
6721 TO ALL: THE FOLLOWING IS AN ARTICLE ON 10 WARNING SIGNS OF A STOCK SCAM. READ Shanstar-1/24/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):