SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
PCTR-Perceptronics
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
710 6 0 PCTR
Emcee:  GARY P GROBBEL Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
685(COMTEX) B: Perceptronics Announces Fiscal Year 2001 Second Quarter R GARY P GROBBEL-11/16/2000
684The 2nd Quarter (ended September 30th) Financial Statement should be out very soDaveS-11/14/2000
683Thanks for the update about the settlement of outstanding debt obligations. ThatAgenda-11/2/2000
682I certainly do not deny that cash flow is a BIG concern. However, the 10Q reportDaveS-11/2/2000
681nice to see a strong pulse here...93,000 traded today, up a dime, and we are movGARY P GROBBEL-11/2/2000
680Ok, thanks. DNA's work looks really incredible.caly-11/2/2000
679Caly, I have to admit, I haven't really tried to sort out much beyond the liEric Fader-11/2/2000
678Eric, I'm having a little trouble sorting out the cohabitation with DNA Stucaly-11/2/2000
677The "significant reduction in cash flow" was intentional as they elimiEric Fader-11/2/2000
676sorry, SI glitch - see next post <eom>Eric Fader-11/2/2000
675You are correct in what you say, but it appears to me that they are in default oAgenda-11/2/2000
674Perceptronics has had a "severe liquidity problem" for much of the pasDaveS-11/2/2000
673<And of course a successful financing arrangement.> Based on my read of tAgenda-11/2/2000
672Yes, Eric, it has been a long wait, but I feel worth it. Perceptroniocs first pDaveS-11/2/2000
671Well, Dave, you were off by a couple of months. But I was even more premature: Eric Fader-11/2/2000
670The annual meeting is September 15th. I'm hoping for some news prior to thenDaveS-9/7/2000
669The difference is hidden in your answer. The price was higher then because tthe rjk01-8/19/2000
668I agree, Eric. The company is in virtually the same position now as it was in FeDaveS-8/18/2000
667No surprise here, either. Obviously management knew that its decision to changeEric Fader-8/18/2000
666The Financial results are what I expected. Remember that the working capital andDaveS-8/18/2000
665The First Quarter Financial Statements should be coming out soon. I don't exDaveS-8/14/2000
664Thanks, Jim. That's what I was hoping to hear. I think the time has finallEric Fader-7/15/2000
663J.N. Thanks for your comments, much appreciated. The clarification of content rthomas a. burke-7/14/2000
662Flow of revenue statement in that article is not applicable to PCTR. PCTR buildJ Navarro-7/14/2000
661Hi Eric, Another non-techie, now I don't feel so bad. I saw the article as thomas a. burke-7/14/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):