SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
AMAT Off-Topic Forum
An SI Board Since October 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
786 5 0
Emcee:  FiloF Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
711Jerome-- Mike is entirely correct when he speaks about Jewish persecution. ReaFred Levine-4/25/2002
710>>>Jews are always more vulnerable to genocide than any other group, &lJerome-4/25/2002
709Runes, As you know i have replied to you privately and shared some of those sentmichael97123-4/25/2002
708Fred, Another point to contend with in the middle east. They respect force yes.michael97123-4/25/2002
707TO all - ...Michael is spot on about my intentions to get people to question thrunes-4/25/2002
706Fred, I wrote runes separately and did not put him on ignore. I am disturbed by michael97123-4/25/2002
705To all-- Mike, I think Runes or Jerome or anyone who disagrees should not be puFred Levine-4/25/2002
704From Todays New York Time Saudi to Warn Bush of Rupture Over Israel Policy By Jerome-4/25/2002
703Mike...why accuse Runes or anyone else on these threads of being anti-Israel or Jerome-4/25/2002
702Sorry Fred but i think we are being played by runes in this argument. He is a mamichael97123-4/24/2002
701am putting you on ignore. You are just looking to annoy and you have done that.michael97123-4/24/2002
700Michael - First, I am not ignoring you per se. But you keep throwing out inflarunes-4/24/2002
699Fred, What happens if sharon annexes 50% of the WB and removes settlements from michael97123-4/24/2002
6981.Arabs are arabs--they are defined nationally by where the europeans put them. michael97123-4/24/2002
697Fred - Of course we are crossing lines - it wouldn't be much of a debate orunes-4/24/2002
696And mikes position keeps moving too. The Sharon plan to annex 50% of the WB is bmichael97123-4/24/2002
695Runes and Mike-- I did read the Podhoretz report and it was indicative of much Fred Levine-4/23/2002
694<b>Too much arguing about history guys.</b> Only point is whether wmichael97123-4/23/2002
693Fred - <My point is that if the Arabs, for political and religious reasons,runes-4/23/2002
692Runes and Fred, Good dialogue. As an aside, Christians in Bethlehem are desparatmichael97123-4/23/2002
691Runes-- I am not an apologist for US policy. Indeed, I condemned much of the aFred Levine-4/23/2002
690Fred - 1 <Arafat never gave a counteroffer...> So if Arafat had countererunes-4/22/2002
689Great post Fred! Actually Lewis has been one of my gurus here all along. It is michael97123-4/22/2002
688Runes and Mike- Re: >>Specifically, if we had not been supporting IsraelFred Levine-4/22/2002
687Michael - as you say, depending on where you start the blow by blow commentary, runes-4/22/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News