SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Booms, Busts, and Recoveries
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
74559 538 0
Emcee:  tradermike_1999 Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
71234Indeed. But the chicken guts in the form of CDS spreads are saying that financicarranza214/1/2009
71233Wow, FAZ $100 to $20 in under a month is quite a move: finance.yahoo.com A bitMaurice Winn14/1/2009
71232Mq, given the recent action in CDS spreads on financials as documented by Simon carranza213/31/2009
71231Hello, Mq. You might be right, if you believe that CDS spreads are a good divincarranza213/31/2009
71230Wow Mq, from $90 a share for SKF to $110 already. Up 20% just like that. ItMaurice Winn13/31/2009
71229The evil-doing megalomaniacs in China plan to tighten their grasp on citizen serMaurice Winn23/27/2009
71228Here we go, government approval to be required to put a packet of chewing gum onMaurice Winn13/26/2009
71227But Snow, your reasoning leads directly to Big Brother and mindless minions aka Maurice Winn23/25/2009
71226Mq, your defense of Greenspan gets lamer every day. Of course people are mindlesSnowshoe43/25/2009
71225Good God!! SKF at $90 a share. I have doubled up again. Zim the Amazing is, IMaurice Winn33/23/2009
71224I have now covered all my SKF and have doubled up again, loaded to the gills witMaurice Winn23/23/2009
71223So you might hope: <<i>It looks like you have more shocks of a lifetimMaurice Winn23/23/2009
71222It looks like you have more shocks of a lifetime in store for you than GreenspanElroy Jetson-3/23/2009
71221Elroy, he was more surprised that shareholders took so little care of their capiMaurice Winn23/23/2009
71220Greenspan was "shocked" to discover that bank management chose to throElroy Jetson23/23/2009
71219Snow, you are out of date on the chicken plucking. It's all machinery now. Maurice Winn33/22/2009
71218>>two consecutive years worth of working at inner city McDonalds<< Snowshoe-3/22/2009
71217That's a shame. I thought maybe you had come up with some suggestions to imMaurice Winn23/22/2009
71216Why? For the sake of good form. I cannot be seen to agree with you on everythicarranza223/22/2009
71215Why ever not? <<i>I agree with all but your fifth point. </i>>Maurice Winn23/22/2009
71214I agree with all but your fifth point.carranza213/22/2009
71213Has beens all! <<i>There are no FDRs, JFKs, George Marshalls, AlexandeMaurice Winn23/22/2009
71212<I>My preference is for market clearing of years, as has happened so far, carranza213/21/2009
71211>>will likely last years, maybe a decade, could be longer<< The DJISnowshoe-3/21/2009
71210The housing implosion and downstream effects make the Y2K Biotelecosmictechdot.cMaurice Winn23/21/2009
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):