SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
QQQ - Nasdaq 100 Trust
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
840 98 0 QQQ
Emcee:  M CAHILL Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
740The birth rate is accelerating. Also, re: "greatest re-distributions of weaSavant-6/1/2002
739<I>Question, category: rhetorical...Where were the 'guardians' of Dan Duchardt-6/1/2002
738On-going witch hunt, in which they'll find witches aplenty, should further eSavant-6/1/2002
737INV H&S commentary..Price Headley's Daily TrendWatch April 29, 2002 9:3Savant-4/29/2002
736Hi S, It appears the market is attempting to flush out the speculators once agaiOldAIMGuy-4/28/2002
735Michael, here you go, an inverted head and shoulders, appears to be, at any rateSavant-4/27/2002
734Well, here we are in the Mar/Apr time frame...how does everyone feel about the pSavant-4/27/2002
733Try the Mid-Cap 400 or 600 or the Diamonds [DIA[ sub $100...but the Q's? NoAxxel-4/8/2002
732DOW over 10,000 but NASDAQ still 66% off peak?johnd-2/26/2002
731The lower it gets to the intersection of the shorter term down trend line and thSavant-2/22/2002
730Ouch! That's one scarey chart.Bill Ounce-2/22/2002
729OT-History repeats. "The Moneychangers" by Arthur Hailey. A '?goodSavant-2/21/2002
728Yes, quite. Enough so to be repeated in full, here. NASDAQ 100 Companies Report Savant-1/27/2002
727I heard nasdaq will soon offer an ETF that tracks the entire nasdaq, or 4000 stoDave Pestle-1/27/2002
726Hi S, I thought this article was quite interesting. Message 16958462 SEC hears OldAIMGuy-1/25/2002
725WADR, apparently some disagree this A.M. Perception is a not to be neglected comSavant-1/22/2002
724Nasdaq is not overvalued: geocities.comRobert Scott-1/21/2002
723Sorry, perhaps I was a little raw from the psychological bruising which I attribMichael Sphar-1/18/2002
722Not quite certain what the disagreement might be about? The sell off, and as youSavant-1/17/2002
721I disagree. I think this is a Wallstreet orchestrated attack on the early ripenMichael Sphar-1/17/2002
720No surprises here..... Stocks Fall Sharply on Intel, JP Morgan Jan 16 4:40pSavant-1/16/2002
719<i>we should see qqq trending one way or another by the end of this month.Dominick-1/14/2002
718Intel reports Tuesday, msft and xlnx report Thursday. All three are in the top Michael Sphar-1/14/2002
717Get ready for the next leg up in this Bull Market: geocities.comRobert Scott-1/12/2002
716Looking at the timing of buying into QQQ, here is one of the tools I tend to likMichael Sphar-1/4/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News