SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
QUANTUM
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9124 27 0 QNTM
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7499 Verona, Maybe everyone is starting to figure out that the analysts are usuaRussell McGuire-3/12/1998
7498 RFF do you have level 2 trading access? Wondering why QNTM is going up big todVerona-3/12/1998
7497 Stich, Re: <i> IMO we have a ways to go before the best buying time. I fSMALL FRY-3/11/1998
7496 Larry, An answer to your question & a sobering forecast. You asked how lonStitch-3/11/1998
7495 I think as long as there still is a possibility for QNTM gives earning shortfalRealMuLan-3/11/1998
7494 Seen a few large blocks go by after the close.....about 200,000 shares in all..RFF-3/11/1998
7493 >However, I don't think that this product family [Bigfoot] was designed LK2-3/11/1998
7492 Mike, Your post about focusing on the low end was interesting, but I take issuRFF-3/11/1998
7491 Right now, Quantum has the Bigfoot series which offers the best $$/Gig of anyboUpwardBound-3/11/1998
7490 Seriously, everytime someone blows a lid after getting crushed in one of my hoJeff Egg-3/10/1998
7489 < RE: CPQ's warning, lets stop a moment and think about something. You gDave O.-3/10/1998
7488 Again the issue is which DD maker is best positioned to take advantage of the lMike C-3/10/1998
7487 RE: CPQ's warning, lets stop a moment and think about something. You get thMyron Z.-3/10/1998
7486 Kevin, you are right, I've seen it before on other threads, too. This is thMyron Z.-3/10/1998
7485 Kevin, <<No-one likes to lose money, that is quite normal. There is absoHungry Investor-3/10/1998
7484 Thread Got this off their home page quantum.com March 9, 1998 pamela baker-3/10/1998
7483 RFF; I agree with your comments about the poster. I would hardly ascribe to hiStitch-3/10/1998
7482 BTW, the stock has split 2 for 1 since the numbers you refer to last year. I wstill learning-3/10/1998
7481 It's the high information content messges like yours that really make thesestill learning-3/10/1998
7480 Kevin, Didn't mean to imply that that's what you were inferring. That&RFF-3/10/1998
7479 RFF, I really was not suggesting that the previous poster was not "smart&qHoatzin-3/10/1998
7478 He probably wasn't smart enough to figure out that even though CPQ's reRFF-3/10/1998
7477 Usually when posts like that appear, they are a good indication that the bottomHoatzin-3/10/1998
7476 Strange - Here's a gentleman who thinks that the way to convince us that tom pope-3/10/1998
7475 Yes, and last summer the anal dick heads thought this shit hole of a company wowayne nikituk-3/10/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News