SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
2000 Date-Change Problem: Scam, Hype, Hoax, Fraud
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1361 14 0
Emcee:  Bill Wexler Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
786murphysoftware.com Is it those pills that Murphy keeps by his side? Scarecrow-6/5/1998
785 >>> And some will not work. Just like in 1998, 2001, 2020, 1932, andjwk-6/5/1998
784 <<MOST THINGS WILL WORK ON 1/1/2000.>> Correct. And some will notBill Wexler-6/5/1998
783 <<What they don't seem to address is that it is not simply a tech issBill Wexler-6/5/1998
782 LOL!!! You're kidding....right? Every day that goes by continues to proveBill Wexler-6/5/1998
781 <<The delays, the difficulty in getting started, the budget overuns, the Peach-6/3/1998
780 While I give it little credence, many people believe that this is a job securitSteve Woas-6/3/1998
779 RH, I'll throw this back at you... A logical argument assumes the antagoniJeffrey S. Mitchell-6/3/1998
778 I'll just throw this out there... It seems to me that those who feel Y2K iRH-6/3/1998
777 >>Is it possible the shorts have covered and abandoned this thread,or maRuyi-6/2/1998
776 >>> Is it possible some could be more worried about thier Y2K portfojwk-6/1/1998
775 >>>>>What good does it do anyone to constantly point to what proCheeky Kid-5/31/1998
774 Re: Trains This is from the briefing column of the 5/30 business sction of thjwk-5/31/1998
773 Sire -- It has become plainly obvious that one of the main tactics of the peopljwk-5/31/1998
772 John:I nor you know what will or will not happen,but what if. US Govt. has veryRuyi-5/31/1998
771 David: I didn't write article.I do know however that when politicians deny Ruyi-5/31/1998
770 Doug - <i>Re: Draft article</i> Was that draft or daft? <g>David Eddy-5/31/1998
769 The other side of the coin: YEAR 2000 REFERENCES AND REPRINTS: softwaremanageCheeky Kid-5/31/1998
768 Wondering if your home appliances or office appliances are Y2K compliant? TheCheeky Kid-5/31/1998
767 <b>Hamasaki on Drafting programmers</b> From a WRP of May 1998... John Mansfield-5/31/1998
766 << Senator Bennett (R Utah) stated at the DC Y2K meeting that there will John Mansfield-5/31/1998
765 David:Re: Draft article, it fits right in on this thread Rumor and Speculation.Ruyi-5/31/1998
764 The ACLU and a dozen other high tech industries would file for an injunction soDale Baker-5/31/1998
763 Doug - <i>Just read on SI: US. Gov. may Draft Cobol Programmers.Human<David Eddy-5/31/1998
762 <<Again: this issue has been discussion at depth at c.s.y2k last year; thJohn Mansfield-5/31/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):