SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IBM
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
8220 178 0 IBM
Emcee:  Dave Lyall Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7944ibm is a 'can they cook the books again this Q? ' play ... roll your diVictor Lazlo-7/1/2003
7943finance.yahoo.com^IXIC&d=c&k=c1&c=ibm&a=v&p=s&t=6m&lALTERN8-7/1/2003
7942Re: <i>IBM is a value play here @ 82 IMHO.</i> Ok, and why? SomethBill Martin-7/1/2003
7941IBM is a value play here @ 82 IMHO.ALTERN8-7/1/2003
7940I agree Arrow, I got in IBM yesterday on weakness.ALTERN8-6/4/2003
7939Hi Victor, regarding the JDSU issue, the SEC was involved and left without sayinArrow Hd.-6/4/2003
7938Yes Jules; You can go to the SEC offices and get in the 'Honest Investor&#Victor Lazlo-6/3/2003
7937I agree re Hickey. <<financial engineering of the balance sheet through uVictor Lazlo-6/3/2003
7936I read somewhere that without the share buybacks, return on IBM's stock duriVictor Lazlo-6/3/2003
7935All good points Charles. The sad thing is that the SEC often just disappears afArrow Hd.-6/3/2003
7934It's hard to know; there's so little information available at this time.Charles Tutt-6/3/2003
7933Probably not, but PW holds huge clout and after the Enron debacles they are moreArrow Hd.-6/3/2003
7932I don't think IBM is as conservative in its finances as it once was. CharCharles Tutt-6/3/2003
7931Jacques, you can call them "shenanigans" if you wish but the fact is IArrow Hd.-6/3/2003
7930Where was the SEC in year 2000 when I owned over 250 Put contracts, as well as bJules B. Garfunkel-6/3/2003
7929Ever hear of accounting shenanigans Arrow? Sure you have. That's another wJacques Newey-6/3/2003
7928I agree, but I wanted to highlight how speculative all of this is, given how litCharles Tutt-6/3/2003
7927Ever hear of margins Victor? Do you have any idea what the cost/expense equatioArrow Hd.-6/3/2003
7926Charles, that happens to be an excellent point. That is a possibility but consiArrow Hd.-6/3/2003
7925LOL ! "IBM - They can do no wrong !! " gotta love it !! watch out toVictor Lazlo-6/3/2003
7924Arrow, even you, as a IBM love-it-or-leave-it kinda guy have to admit that when Victor Lazlo-6/3/2003
7923I have been critical of IBM when I think it is warranted. I have taken to task Arrow Hd.-6/3/2003
7922You've stated your true-blue I-Love-IBM opinion on the plant sale. It was Victor Lazlo-6/3/2003
7921Are we sure the investigation is looking for overly aggressive recognition ratheCharles Tutt-6/3/2003
7920First of all, IBM was not "outed" by anyone. That transaction was repArrow Hd.-6/3/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):