SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry
An SI Board Since January 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
81568 36 0
Emcee:  ChinuSFO Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
79443 You think things are difficult with the insurgency in Iraq and your right abouTimF9/18/2006
79442 The truce relies on the tribal parties to control the area. That might possibTimF9/18/2006
79441 Its not even remotely close to being established. Its not even 100% certain tTimF9/18/2006
79440Fact: Pakistan admits a truce to protect Bin Laden which creates a de facto permAmerican Spirit9/18/2006
79439Yes a fact: Osama was trapped at Tora Bora and Bush let him get away. That is abAmerican Spirit9/18/2006
79438In other words, Iraq had "better targets"?! Some of Rummy's wisdsea_biscuit9/18/2006
79437 I never said Iraq was closely connected to Al Qaeda. Pakistan is much morTimF9/18/2006
79436Duh! Iraq had almost nothing to do with Al Qaeda. Whereas, Pakistan, with its sea_biscuit9/18/2006
79435 Iraq was a far better candidate for intervention than Pakistan.TimF9/18/2006
79434 I said I don't want to waste all day arguing about hypotheticals. I justTimF9/18/2006
79433<i> Gore probably wouldn't have invaded Iraq, but that would mean thatsea_biscuit9/18/2006
79432<i> Not invading Pakistan is probably a very good idea. The downside outwesea_biscuit9/18/2006
79431<i> I do think that things would likely have been worse if Gore was presidsea_biscuit9/18/2006
79430Message 22824224TimF9/18/2006
79429Iraq is a very large part of how F-ed up things are in general. Many other prosea_biscuit9/18/2006
79428 I'm listening just fine. Your not making any comments that are both relTimF9/18/2006
79427 Even on the issue of the Iraqi invasion, the question of would Gore have invadTimF9/18/2006
79426Duh! At no point prior to the Iraq invasion did Gore support it even though sosea_biscuit9/18/2006
79425you ain't listening.... bush just SAID...verbatim he would NOT even send in Skywatcher9/18/2006
79424<I> What hypotheticals? </i> What would have happened if Gore wasTimF9/18/2006
79423 Gore probably wouldn't have invaded Iraq, but that would mean that Saddam TimF9/18/2006
79422What hypotheticals? The neocons wanted Clinton to attack Iraq. He didn't. sea_biscuit9/18/2006
79421you're SO LOST!...Gore would NEVER have invaded Iraq and would have held theSkywatcher9/18/2006
79420 I do think that things would likely have been worse if Gore was president. BuTimF9/18/2006
79419During much of the Clinton administration, Congress was in the hands of the Regrsea_biscuit9/18/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):