SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
OAKLEY- NYSE:OO
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1383 7 0 OO
Emcee:  stockvalinvestor Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
833 I wasn't actually there to see it, but it was referenced by some articles iBrian C. Lund-7/20/1997
832 Good points Brian. Is it fact or rumour that Nike approached Oakley a year agoSam Nizam-7/20/1997
831 A couple of points Sam........... 1. Nike approached OO about a year ago and Brian C. Lund-7/20/1997
830 Oakley is 56% owned by insiders so NO ONE, NOT EVEN NIKE CAN BUY THEM! JANNARDDr. Jeff-7/19/1997
829 BCL, There was an article in the business section of Friday's LA Times aboSam Nizam-7/19/1997
828 David, I too expect/hope OO to regain its old support level and move from theregiles-7/18/1997
827 Montgomery did not lower its 3rd quarter earnings. Since they said they expectDavid Naggar-7/18/1997
826 It's interesting to hear others' trading/investing objectives. OO'Ms. Baby Boomer-7/18/1997
825 Brian, Good play! You play by the rules! That is to be commended. I agree wiDr. Jeff-7/18/1997
824 Hello everybody, how's trading? <G>. Sorry, I have been away from myBrian C. Lund-7/18/1997
823 Well Arman, At least you've got the 'nads to come back to the readers oTrey Yon-7/18/1997
822 I sold all my shares at 11 3/4. took the loss & fired the damn broker. The Falcon-7/18/1997
821 <i>Does anyone have a good mantra?</i> There's always the old Mark Bracey-7/18/1997
820 Ouch! I'm expecting/hoping support will hang in @ 12 3/8, too. If it doesgiles-7/18/1997
819 Here we go. Trading started at 12 I believe. I'm in for 5000 shares at 11 1grasshopper-7/18/1997
818 Mr. Lund, Allow me to say that I am impressed with your TA of OO up to date. Cagrasshopper-7/18/1997
817 Well, Ladies & Gents, The numbers weren't quite as I expected, but theyFalcon-7/18/1997
816 Tx for the report on the conference call. Very informative posts. I would hagiles-7/18/1997
815 There were several questions this morning about gross margins. Oakley's maDavid Naggar-7/17/1997
814 OK, so much for that, read it somewhere on SI thread. Quote from William J. O&Ms. Baby Boomer-7/17/1997
813 Now you're reaching........................<G>. BCLBrian C. Lund-7/17/1997
812 "Oakley, based in Foothill Ranch, Calif., said it has never lost a patent Ms. Baby Boomer-7/17/1997
811 Even Reuter thought it newsworthy. I forgot to mention the 400 shares, oops! HDr. Jeff-7/17/1997
810 Block Trade - Oakley Inc [OO.N] 259,400 at 12-1/2 down 1/16, crossed by Nat WeMs. Baby Boomer-7/17/1997
809 I find the price action interesting too considering the sell #'s. Thanks fMs. Baby Boomer-7/17/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):