SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Citrix Systems (CTXS)
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9068 119 0 CTXS
Emcee:  Steven Tsai Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8443 Redman- As you know GOJO and SCOC are the only somewhat credible, direct competMikeM54321-6/14/2000
8442 Any thoughts on this GOJO deal with HP for their unix system. I am curious howRedman-6/14/2000
8441 Hey, this could be the perfect stock for the times, as it now falls into both tShaw-6/14/2000
8440 delete, subject better covered in previous postsMike Buckley-6/14/2000
8439 I have a small private software products company. There is no question about iSweet Ol-6/14/2000
8438 More vultures........Shareholders sue software firm Citrix (UPDATE: Updates witpuborectalis-6/14/2000
8437 <edited>Hi Jon & Red - people on NT thread has known about her ASP amBosco-6/14/2000
8436 Answered my own question. Good to see they work with CTXS. Red Founded in 19Redman-6/14/2000
8435 Had anybody heard of this ASP before ? It definitely would be the first step iRedman-6/14/2000
8434 hangman, <<it is in fact an admission that they did not have the informatDaniel Simon-6/14/2000
8433 Interesting announcement from NT today. They are paying $275 million for a smaJames Hutton-6/14/2000
8432 Here come the vultures: sun-sentinel.comgbh-6/14/2000
8431 thanks for the balanced assessment. however, i disagree. a "no show" hangmanboothill-6/14/2000
8430 Doug, I have been digestiShaw-6/14/2000
8429 >>Daniel, re: "but there is no "good" way to disappoint.&qCogito-6/14/2000
8428 >>Anybody hear that guy on CNBC ? He said he would sell a bounce in CTXS,Cogito-6/14/2000
8427 Oh Boy Daniel, I hope in our next lives you come back as my boss. With your, wJMD-6/14/2000
8426 From Jubak(MSNBC)... "Turns out that puborectalis-6/13/2000
8425 Yes, we got screwed, but at least its over. The cold hard facts now are thatGreg22-6/13/2000
8424 Management should have reacted faster, but either way the news is still bad. IDaniel Simon-6/13/2000
8423 Hi all - Mike, #s are still good, but I think it is not the #s that will determBosco-6/13/2000
8422 <i>per-share earnings before merger-related charges will drop for the firMike Buckley-6/13/2000
8421 Daniel, re: "but there is no "good" way to disappoint." NotJMD-6/13/2000
8420 I bought this stock for a trade in april, now I'm getting to know it a littShaw-6/13/2000
8419 From Bloomberg 63% Has New Meaning for Citrix (Commentary. DavidSecret_Agent_Man-6/13/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News