SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
WCOM
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11568 152 0 WCOM
Emcee:  Paul Berggren Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9093It's still free falling. Maybe 7 will provide some support? Once it broke Rob S.-2/5/2002
9092SB, do you double the share quantity ... or double the dollars? Ronrkral-2/5/2002
9091Well, just got filled at 7.40. Decent sized bids are getting hit hard. Hope I diOeconomicus-2/5/2002
9090I'm seeing more large blocks (100k) on the buy side than over the past few dRob S.-2/5/2002
9089Rob, I will not only not kill you.... I'll agree 100% regarding your assessmHH-2/5/2002
9088WCOM has bounced off 7.40 twice and is moving down to that level again. It'Rob S.-2/5/2002
9087I'm not trying to stir up trouble here. It should be pretty obvious that invRob S.-2/5/2002
9086there could be a nice snap-back rally. I 'm in for a few g's hopeful foHH-2/5/2002
9085Doubled my position at $7.47. ~SB~SecularBull-2/5/2002
9084Agreed, to some extent. Just as murder rates in NYC rise and fall with the rise Oeconomicus-2/5/2002
9083Treasury Secretary Wants More CEO Accountability siliconinvestor.com Feb 5 9:42JakeStraw-2/5/2002
9082You are exactly right. There has been a weakening of the checks and balances witHH-2/5/2002
9081I totally agree. Just like being an informed voter takes work it takes work to willcousa-2/5/2002
9080I don't think the "lessened" constraints can be found written anywBWAC-2/5/2002
9079Be specific. What regulations, constraints or requirements on boards of directorOeconomicus-2/5/2002
9078Personally, I've been saying this for years now. I'm glad people are fiJ. P.-2/5/2002
9077So vote your proxy that way? Take your money from the mutual fund mismanagers thBWAC-2/5/2002
9076Come on, this is common knowledge . . do you need to go back an take basic businRob S.-2/5/2002
9075Sure it's emotional when people are getting absolutely clobbered by this stoJ. P.-2/5/2002
9074<i>The checks and balances they are supposed to supply has weakened.</iOeconomicus-2/5/2002
9073Yep, the board of Enron sure looked after shareholders interests, didn't theRob S.-2/5/2002
9072I'm not talking about a "shareholder utopia". What gives you thatRob S.-2/5/2002
9071HH, True. AA is still partially to blame.JakeStraw-2/5/2002
9070point taken, however, to conclude AA didn't assist in some accounting gymnasHH-2/5/2002
9069>>It is up to the shareholders to elect a Board which represents their intJakeStraw-2/5/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News